2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Focal Muscle Vibration on Calf Muscle Spasticity: A Proof‐of‐Concept Study

Abstract: II.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lukashevich and Likhachev [ 17 ] studied focal vibration for its ability to reduce poststroke spasticity in 13 volunteers and found that 80 hz and 0.3 amplitude focal vibrations on gastrocnemius muscle reduce maximum amplitudes of H-reflex and M-response as the reflectors of calf muscle spasticity. Another study [ 18 ] about the upper extremity function, spasticity, and grip strength in subjects with poststroke hemiplegia indicated that the use of whole body vibration training combined with task-related training improves arm function, strength, and spasticity. The intervention group had more benefits after 4 weeks of training on the mentioned issues than the control group and the WBV group alone also in accordance with our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lukashevich and Likhachev [ 17 ] studied focal vibration for its ability to reduce poststroke spasticity in 13 volunteers and found that 80 hz and 0.3 amplitude focal vibrations on gastrocnemius muscle reduce maximum amplitudes of H-reflex and M-response as the reflectors of calf muscle spasticity. Another study [ 18 ] about the upper extremity function, spasticity, and grip strength in subjects with poststroke hemiplegia indicated that the use of whole body vibration training combined with task-related training improves arm function, strength, and spasticity. The intervention group had more benefits after 4 weeks of training on the mentioned issues than the control group and the WBV group alone also in accordance with our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing research is proposing segmental muscle vibration (MV) as being a powerful tool for the treatment of focal spasticity in post-stroke patients [ 14 – 15 ]. Mechanical devices deliver low-amplitude/high-frequency vibratory stimuli to specific muscles [ 16 – 17 ], thus offering strong proprioceptive inputs by activating the neural pathway from muscle spindle annulospiral endings to Ia-fiber, dorsal column–medial lemniscal pathway, the ventral posterolateral nucleus of the thalamus (and other nuclei of the basal ganglia), up to the primary somatosensory area (postcentral gyrus and posterior paracentral lobule of the parietal lobe), and the primary motor cortex [ 18 19 ]. At the cortical network level, proprioceptive inputs can alter the excitability of the corticospinal pathway by modulating intracortical inhibitory and facilitatory networks within primary sensory and motor cortex, and affecting the strength of sensory inputs to motor circuits [ 20 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vibrations are believed to initiate muscle contractions by stimulating muscle spindles and alpha motor neurons [4]. The direct vibratory stimulation of muscles may reduce spasticity by influencing the Ia afferent fibers of the muscle spindle, which inhibit the monosynaptic reflex [1216]. Therefore, the H max /M max ratio of the H reflex is significantly decreased, together with clinical spasticity associated with the hypersensitive muscle stretch reflex [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%