2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Fluid–Rock Interactions on In Situ Bacterial Alteration of Interfacial Properties and Wettability of CO2–Brine–Mineral Systems for Geologic Carbon Storage

Abstract: This study explored the feasibility of biosurfactant amendment in modifying the interfacial characteristics of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) with rock minerals under high-pressure conditions for GCS. In particular, while varying the CO 2 phase and the rock mineral, we quantitatively examined the production of biosurfactants by Bacillus subtilis and their effects on interfacial tension (IFT) and wettability in CO 2 −brine−mineral systems. The results demonstrated that surfactin produced by B. subtilis caused the reduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 The bacterial strain of Bacillus subtilis produced a biosurfactant that can reduce the CO 2 -brine interfacial tension and change the wettability of both quartz and calcite minerals, causing less water-wet conditions for the CO 2 geological storage. 30 However, the wettability of H 2 on the quartz's surface after the bacterium effect remained unanswered. It is not predicted how bacteria alter the wettability of rock, which results in adverse effects on withdrawing and injection efficiencies at the field scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…16 The bacterial strain of Bacillus subtilis produced a biosurfactant that can reduce the CO 2 -brine interfacial tension and change the wettability of both quartz and calcite minerals, causing less water-wet conditions for the CO 2 geological storage. 30 However, the wettability of H 2 on the quartz's surface after the bacterium effect remained unanswered. It is not predicted how bacteria alter the wettability of rock, which results in adverse effects on withdrawing and injection efficiencies at the field scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38,39 Recent findings predict that wettability can alter due to the release of in situ biomolecules and organic acids from the bacteria for CO 2 geological storage. 30 No solid data is available on the H 2 −brine−rock wettability in the presence of microorganisms. In this paper, we sought to address this gap by evaluating the effect of wettability alteration on the quartz, i.e., sandstone forming unit in the presence of SRB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discussion about the effect of surface microstructures on the equilibrium contact angle in porous media is available in the literature but seldomly the focus of the research. Although contact angle plays an important role in critical topics including multiphase flow, capillarity, fingering effect, and the pore-scale distribution of immiscible fluid in porous media. Other effects on contact angle such as pressure, temperature, and salinity draw more attention. ,,,, Even the influences of surface chemistry and surface roughness of flat rock surfaces are investigated by a high-resolution camera, the discussion mostly used previous models. Micro-CT has been used to consider the pore topology in real porous media, , and the complex fluid topology and internal energy are considered, but there was no theoretical explanation for the effect of surface roughness and pore geometry on contact angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33−36 Other effects on contact angle such as pressure, temperature, and salinity draw more attention. 1,2,5,6,37 rock surfaces are investigated by a high-resolution camera, the discussion mostly used previous models. Micro-CT has been used to consider the pore topology in real porous media, 8,38 and the complex fluid topology and internal energy are considered, 39−42 but there was no theoretical explanation for the effect of surface roughness and pore geometry on contact angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%