1978
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(78)83646-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Fluid Intake and Dry Matter Concentration on Scours and Water Intake in Calves Fed Once Daily

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Water consumption was greater in EF compared with CF calves for the first 27 days of the study, as a consequence of the greater MR concentration used in the EF (18%) compared with that used in the CF calves (12.5%), as it was reported in the study by Jenny et al (1978). However, coinciding with the days around weaning, EF calves further increased water consumption and the ratio between water consumption and total DMI, suggesting that EF calves tried to compensate for the reduction of MR offered with an increased consumption of water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Water consumption was greater in EF compared with CF calves for the first 27 days of the study, as a consequence of the greater MR concentration used in the EF (18%) compared with that used in the CF calves (12.5%), as it was reported in the study by Jenny et al (1978). However, coinciding with the days around weaning, EF calves further increased water consumption and the ratio between water consumption and total DMI, suggesting that EF calves tried to compensate for the reduction of MR offered with an increased consumption of water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Even though calves fed IM+B had a greater number of days scoring ≥3 for fecal, other studies have shown that increasing milk DM can result in looser stool. In a study conducted by Jenny et al (1978), the incidences of scouring in liquidfed calves was directly related to DM concentration, with an increase in liquid feed or a decrease in calf starter resulting in an increase of calf diarrhea. This could also have been caused by changes in osmolality affecting the absorption of water in the intestines when milk balancer was added to the whole milk and increased the osmolality from 280 to 483 mOsm/L.…”
Section: Health Visual Scoringmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This was probably due to less discrimination being practiced at time of purchase. There was no difference in disease incidence between frequency or feeding level indicating that feeding calves at the higher level was not stressing the calves in the manner suggested by Jenny et al (1978 (Roy et al 1958). The correlation of plasma glucose with feed efficiency observed also indicated a positive metabolic response to the higher level of intake (Payne et al 1970).…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The feeding of milk replacers, containing more than 15Vo dty matter, once a day (Jenny et al 1978) (Fisher 1976).ln contrast to the conclusion of Gibson (1981) Lineweaver and Hafez (1969 . This was probably due to less discrimination being practiced at time of purchase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%