2010
DOI: 10.1002/aic.12179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of flow field heterogeneity in coagulators on aggregate size and structure

Abstract: Aggregate size and structure were investigated under turbulent conditions in stirred tank (ST) and Taylor-Couette-type (TC-type) devices. Root-mean-square radius of gyration, hRgi, and zero-angle intensity of scattered light, I(0), were acquired as a function of stirring intensity, characterized by an experimentally obtained average hydrodynamic stress, hsi exp , determined by torque measurements. Evaluating aggregate images revealed that aggregate structure and shape are independent of the device type. Howeve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This median size vs. time behavior depicts the flocculation process of type II, which is also composed of the three following phases: fast floc growth (referred to as type II-phase 1 herein), breakage and restructuring (type II-phase 2), and a steady state (type II-phase 3), as described in Section 1 of this paper. The type II-phase 1 presented in the figure could be approximately described as a simple linear increase process, as shown in several previous studies [9,11,20,21,55], rather than the exponential process reported by many authors [10,18,20,56]. Ehrl et al [17] attributed the difference between the linear and exponential trends of the fast aggregate growth phase to different particle sizes for which the relative importance of Brownian motion and shear-induced aggregations changed correspondingly [9].…”
Section: G=14s -1supporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This median size vs. time behavior depicts the flocculation process of type II, which is also composed of the three following phases: fast floc growth (referred to as type II-phase 1 herein), breakage and restructuring (type II-phase 2), and a steady state (type II-phase 3), as described in Section 1 of this paper. The type II-phase 1 presented in the figure could be approximately described as a simple linear increase process, as shown in several previous studies [9,11,20,21,55], rather than the exponential process reported by many authors [10,18,20,56]. Ehrl et al [17] attributed the difference between the linear and exponential trends of the fast aggregate growth phase to different particle sizes for which the relative importance of Brownian motion and shear-induced aggregations changed correspondingly [9].…”
Section: G=14s -1supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Among various systems that could be used to generate a shear flow, such as an impeller mixer, an oscillating grid and the Couette apparatus [9,12,14,27,29], the Couette-flow system was used in this study because it can generate a more isotropic shear flow than any other devices and avoids the need to account for the impacts of turbulence heterogeneity on the flocculation process [18,23,30]. The Couette device consists of an inner cylinder with a radius of 150 mm and an outer cylinder with a radius of 236 mm and 682 mm tall.…”
Section: Turbulence-generating Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] In parallel to the experimental activity, mathematical modeling or theoretical considerations have been used to describe the breakup of aggregates. 2,3,9,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] The result of these studies is a scaling of the maximum stable size of formed aggregates as a function of the applied stress, or corresponding shear rate or energy dissipation rate e. The critical stress can be precisely evaluated in uniform flow fields under laminar conditions, e.g., couette flow or contracting nozzle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ehrl et al 50 observed in their experiments (with g K a [ [1) that the radius of gyration R g scaled with the energy dissipation rate e according to R g ! To determine these, of large ensembles of aggregates, size n agg , and radius of gyration R g were determined, and the relationship n agg ¼ a R g a d f was fitted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%