2010
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.81.041306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of finite container size on granular jet formation

Abstract: When an object is dropped into a bed of fine, loosely packed sand, a surprisingly energetic jet shoots out of the bed. In this work we study the effect that boundaries have on the granular jet formation. We did this by ͑i͒ decreasing the depth of the sand bed and ͑ii͒ reducing the container diameter to only a few ball diameters. These confinements change the behavior of the ball inside the bed, the void collapse, and the resulting jet height and shape. We map the parameter space of impact with Froude number, a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Worthington & Cole (1897, 1900 and Worthington (1908) were the first to investigate cavity formation and splash characteristics produced by spheres impacting onto liquid surfaces using single-spark illumination photography. Following their work, Mallock (1918), Bell (1924) and Ramsauer & Dobke (1927) provided further descriptions of the observed cavity characteristics, while the first sets of quantitative results were presented by Gilbarg & Anderson (1948), Richardson (1948), May & Woodhull (1948, 1950 and May (1951May ( , 1952 who collectively investigated sphere impacts with water surfaces, highlighting the influence of atmospheric pressure, overall impact forces involved and the effect of the sphere wettability on the observed cavity and splash characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worthington & Cole (1897, 1900 and Worthington (1908) were the first to investigate cavity formation and splash characteristics produced by spheres impacting onto liquid surfaces using single-spark illumination photography. Following their work, Mallock (1918), Bell (1924) and Ramsauer & Dobke (1927) provided further descriptions of the observed cavity characteristics, while the first sets of quantitative results were presented by Gilbarg & Anderson (1948), Richardson (1948), May & Woodhull (1948, 1950 and May (1951May ( , 1952 who collectively investigated sphere impacts with water surfaces, highlighting the influence of atmospheric pressure, overall impact forces involved and the effect of the sphere wettability on the observed cavity and splash characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motion of the impactor, often a dense sphere, in the bed is used to deduce the form of the drag force exerted on the sphere, since it is normally found [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] that a sphere comes to rest at a finite depth below the initial surface level of the bed (note the exceptional results of Ref. [7], showing that the sphere reaches a terminal velocity, resulting in infinite penetration).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A last case corresponds to the impact problem, when an object penetrates vertically the granular layer [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In all these situations, a rich phenomenology has been observed and the velocity dependence [9,16], the effect of the boundaries [20,25], and the existence of lift forces associated with the motion [17] have been studied. One major feature common to all the above configurations is the frictional scaling of the drag force in the limit of quasistatic motions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%