2004
DOI: 10.1080/10298430410001733491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Filler Types on Marshall Stability and Retained Strength of Asphalt Concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…where σ IDT wet is the indirect tensile strength under the wet condition (kPa) and σ IDT dry is the indirect tensile strength under the dry condition (kPa). Besides, the retained Marshall stability test was determined to evaluate the effect of the filler on the loss of compressive strength of asphalt mixes after water immersion [29]. erefore, the MSR was computed as follows:…”
Section: Indirect Tensilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where σ IDT wet is the indirect tensile strength under the wet condition (kPa) and σ IDT dry is the indirect tensile strength under the dry condition (kPa). Besides, the retained Marshall stability test was determined to evaluate the effect of the filler on the loss of compressive strength of asphalt mixes after water immersion [29]. erefore, the MSR was computed as follows:…”
Section: Indirect Tensilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The filler is not considered an aggregate part but a modifier to improve the durability and temperature susceptibility of the asphalt binder and the asphalt concrete mixture [7]. Apart from mineral utilization, fillers can increase the strength and stiffness of asphalt concrete [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in strong binding of the aggregate and asphalt, thereby improving the water stability of the mixture. Ahmad et al [17] studied the effects of using two types of mineral fillers on the strength of asphalt mixtures in terms of the Marshall stability and retained strength, and showed that ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and pulverized limestone have a similar effect on the Marshall stability. Thus, the use of OPC resulted in higher values of retained strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%