1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf00011517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of fertilization on biomass and nutrient content of fine roots in a beech-birch-maple stand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These data suggest that under ambient light conditions an increasing fraction of N was derived from fixation in T. pratense but that an increasing fraction of N was derived from the decomposition of SOM in F. virginiana. • Fertilization and irrigation tend to increase root proliferation in surface soil (Safford 1974;Prior et al 1994). Surface pools of SOM are more depleted in 15 N relative to deeper soil horizons, thus if greater N uptake occurred in the top of the soil profile in the PMoFe treatment, we would expect the foliage of T. pratense to be depleted in foliar d 15 N relative to the control treatments, the opposite of what was observed (Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…These data suggest that under ambient light conditions an increasing fraction of N was derived from fixation in T. pratense but that an increasing fraction of N was derived from the decomposition of SOM in F. virginiana. • Fertilization and irrigation tend to increase root proliferation in surface soil (Safford 1974;Prior et al 1994). Surface pools of SOM are more depleted in 15 N relative to deeper soil horizons, thus if greater N uptake occurred in the top of the soil profile in the PMoFe treatment, we would expect the foliage of T. pratense to be depleted in foliar d 15 N relative to the control treatments, the opposite of what was observed (Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Some studies imply that fine root biomass increases in nutrient rich zones, while some species also have a high fine root biomass in nutrient poor zones. The average of fine root biomass of the forest ecosystems in this study (1.214 g (100cm 3 ) -1 ) was substantially lower than estimates from Safford (1974), but not all temperate forest ecosystems. It is likely that gravels constitute the large portion of soil profiles in Jiufeng area: 10% in the top soil of 15 cm, 15% to a soil depth of 30 cm and 20% at soil depths below 30 cm.…”
Section: Role Of Root Biomass In Soil Preferential Flow Of Forest Ecocontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…It is likely that gravels constitute the large portion of soil profiles in Jiufeng area: 10% in the top soil of 15 cm, 15% to a soil depth of 30 cm and 20% at soil depths below 30 cm. However, gravels constituted only 9% of the soil profiles studied by McClaugherty et al (1984) and Safford (1974) did not state gravels.…”
Section: Role Of Root Biomass In Soil Preferential Flow Of Forest Ecomentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The relatively small contribution of fine roots to Ca 2+ flux can be explained in part by the turnover rate. The concentration of Ca in fine roots is similar to that of other northern hardwood forests (Safford 1974), but are less than one-half the concentration found for other forests where data on fine root turnover are available (Joslin and Henderson 1987). Nevertheless, most of this decrease in Ca 2+ was due to uptake by the vegetation and subsequent recycling by canopy leaching and litter inputs.…”
Section: Calciummentioning
confidence: 64%