2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.02.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ferrofluid concentration on electrical and magnetic properties of the Fe3O4/PANI nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 The properties of these nanocomposites are quite different from pristine PANI due to interfacial interactions between metal oxide nanoparticles and PANI macromolecules. 11,12 The composite properties can be easily adjusted to the desired applications via the variation of particle size, shape and the distribution of nanoparticles. 13,14 Consequently, PANI may have potential applications in electrical nanodevices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The properties of these nanocomposites are quite different from pristine PANI due to interfacial interactions between metal oxide nanoparticles and PANI macromolecules. 11,12 The composite properties can be easily adjusted to the desired applications via the variation of particle size, shape and the distribution of nanoparticles. 13,14 Consequently, PANI may have potential applications in electrical nanodevices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aphesteguy et al reported preparation and characterization of Ni-Gd ferrite polyaniline composite of both conducting and ferromagnetic characterizations [9]. Alam et al reported the effect of ferrofluid concentration on electrical and magnetic properties of the Fe 3 O 4 / PANI nanocomposites [10]. As far as the composites were concerned, phase separation was a commonplace due to their poor compatibility between polymer matrix and inorganic particles [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The saturation magnetization (M S ) for the Fe 2 O 3 NPs is 64.4 emu/g, whereas the saturation magnetization of the EAPM-NPs is 44.1 emu/g. The decrease in M S value for the EAPM-NPs is expected due to surface interactions between the polymer (polyaniline) which is diamagnetic in nature, and iron oxide NPs [124]. The remanent magnetization M r for the Fe 2 O 3 and the EAPM-NPs are 14.2 and 10.4 emu/g, respectively, and the coercive force H c for both NPs is 200 Oe.…”
Section: Integrated Extraction/detection Magnetic Nanoparticle-based mentioning
confidence: 96%