2009
DOI: 10.1186/2047-783x-14-2-65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of fenofibrate on microcirculation and wound healing in healthy and diabetic mice

Abstract: Objective Disturbances in wound healing in patients with hyperglycaemic blood sugar values are a common clinical problem. Recent studies identified PPARα-ligands as potential skin therapeutic agents. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of oral fenofibrate treatment on dermal wound healing and micro-circulatory parameters in diabetic mice. Methods Dermal wounds were created in CD-1 mice. Mice were randomized into four treatment groups: diabetic mice trea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an important member of the super-family, it has been reported that the synthesis of PPAR-gamma is increased following exposure to inflammation, and it significantly suppresses collagen production ( 45 ). Relevant to the present discussion, PPAR pathway regulating drugs have been reported to influence wound healing in preclinical models ( 46 ). In addition, PPAR-gamma agonists have also recently been documented to regulate ECM production in human fibroblasts ( 47 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As an important member of the super-family, it has been reported that the synthesis of PPAR-gamma is increased following exposure to inflammation, and it significantly suppresses collagen production ( 45 ). Relevant to the present discussion, PPAR pathway regulating drugs have been reported to influence wound healing in preclinical models ( 46 ). In addition, PPAR-gamma agonists have also recently been documented to regulate ECM production in human fibroblasts ( 47 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%