2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of femoral component position on biomechanical outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A previously validated FE model of an intact knee joint was employed in this study to address our two main research questions ( Figure 1 ). 30 33 First, what biomechanical effect can the PCL-deficient UKA provide as compared to the intact PCL and the intact UKA? Second, how does an increased posterior tibial slope affect the kinematics and contact stress of the patellofemoral (PF) joint and tibial cartilage?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previously validated FE model of an intact knee joint was employed in this study to address our two main research questions ( Figure 1 ). 30 33 First, what biomechanical effect can the PCL-deficient UKA provide as compared to the intact PCL and the intact UKA? Second, how does an increased posterior tibial slope affect the kinematics and contact stress of the patellofemoral (PF) joint and tibial cartilage?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guide should be lateralized as far as possible, aligning to the lateral border of the medial femoral condyle to avoid impingement on the intercondylar notch. This will increase the likelihood of the tibial component to properly track with the femur in extension and prevent patellofemoral impingement [63]. When properly sized, there should be a rim of at least 2 mm of exposed bone, anterior and medial to the femoral finishing guide (Fig.…”
Section: Femoral Sizing and Final Femoral Preparation Femoral Sizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies have focused not only on stress or strain on bone, but also looked at stress on soft tissue. Therefore, modeling not only of the femur, but also of cartilage and the lateral meniscus became required (Innocenti et al, 2014;Innocenti et al, 2016;Kang et al, 2018f;Kang et al, 2019c;Kang et al, 2018h;Kang et al, 2018i;Kang et al, 2018j;Kwon et al, 2014;Kwon et al, 2017;Park et al, 2019;Simpson, Price, Gulati, Murray and Gill, 2009;Wen et al, 2017;Zhu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Application Of Computational Simulation In Pre-or Post-clinimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bone stress and ligament strain can potentially lead to an osteoarthritic progression under static loading conditions (Innocenti, Bilgen, Labey, van Lenthe, Sloten and Catani, 2014). In addition, Kang et al showed that the best position for the femoral component in UKA could be the center of the distal femoral condyle under dynamic loading conditions (Kang, Son, Koh, Kwon, Kwon, Lee and Park, 2018i). Femoral component position could be one of the important factors that influence the contact stresses on the tibial insert and articular cartilage, hence the postoperative significance of the femoral component position in UKA (Kang, Son, Koh, Kwon, Kwon, Lee and Park, 2018i).…”
Section: Application Of Computational Simulation In Pre-or Post-clinimentioning
confidence: 99%