1991
DOI: 10.1017/s0003356100020328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of feeding whole and rolled barley to steers in the morning or afternoon in diets containing differing proportions of hay and grain

Abstract: A 2 X 2 X 2 factorial experiment was conducted with 128 growing-finishing steer calves to examine the effects of feeding whole v. rolled barley in diets containing either a constant proportion of concentrate (0-67) or proportionately 0-33 concentrate for 56 days followed by 0-90 concentrate for 83 days, with the concentrate being given at either 08.00 or 15.30 h. Steers given hay at 08.00 h and concentrate at 15.50 h grew proportionately 0-05 faster (P < 0-05) and had better dry matter (DM): gain ratios (P < 0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). This is consistent with other data where no differences in daily gain were detected between steers fed whole and rolled barley (Mathison et al 1991a;Yaremcio et al 1991). However, steers fed the barley which was only slightly processed ate 3.2 and 6.6% more (P < 0.05) DM daily than those fed the medium-rolled and crushed barley, respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Degree Of Processingsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2). This is consistent with other data where no differences in daily gain were detected between steers fed whole and rolled barley (Mathison et al 1991a;Yaremcio et al 1991). However, steers fed the barley which was only slightly processed ate 3.2 and 6.6% more (P < 0.05) DM daily than those fed the medium-rolled and crushed barley, respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Degree Of Processingsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Since these flakes were much thinner than those prepared by Hironaka et al (1992) (1.61 to 2.00 mm), his results also suggest that no marked reduction in performance would occur if grain is subjected to excessive processing. Similarly, although Mathison (1981) observed a 6% decrease in daily gain when steers were fed ground barley (6.4 mm screen) rather than dryrolled grain, feed efficiency was only reduced by 1%.…”
Section: Effect Of Degree Of Processingmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, unprocessed corn is effectively digested by ruminants and the feed:gain ratios in cattle fed whole corn are similar to those fed rolled corn (Chester- Jones and Ziegler, 1991). Predictably, the feed:gain ratio of cattle fed whole barley is consistently lower than that of cattle fed rolled barley (Mathison et al, 1991;Hironaka et al, 19921, and both barley and wheat must be processed for efficient ruminal digestion.…”
Section: Role Of Mastication and Feed Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of rolling grains or chopping hay is to make the feeds more digestible thereby providing more nutrients to the animals. Rolled barley has been shown to improve growth rate and feed efficiency compared to whole barley in beef cattle (Mathison et al 1991). However, there is less benefit to feeding processed grain as the level of roughage in the diet increases (Hand 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%