2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-014-0560-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of feeding sorghum straw based complete rations with different roughage to concentrate ratio on dry matter intake, nutrient utilization, and nitrogen balance in Nellore ram lambs

Abstract: An experiment was conducted by feeding sorghum straw (Sorghum bicolor) based complete rations at roughage concentrate ratio 70:30 (CR-I), 60:40 (CR-II), 50:50 (CR-III), and 40:60 (CR-IV) for 180 days to find out suitable ratio of sorghum straw in the complete ration (mash form) on nutrient utilization and nitrogen balance in Nellore ram lambs. The DMI (g/day) increased significantly (P < 0.05) as level of concentrate increased in complete rations. No significant difference was found in digestibilities of proxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the depression in feed conversion with calves fed restricted ration (T4) could be attributed to the higher CF content and lower digestibility of OM than those fed the other restricted rations and control one. These findings are in agreement with those obtained by Sayed (2009), Gaafar et al (2009), Neto et al (2011, Adeleye et al (2011), Abbasi et al (2012) and Malisetty et al (2014), who concluded that feed conversion improved with increasing energy level in the diets. Results here are in contrary with those obtained by Sami et al (2016) who found that Najdi lambs fed restricted ration (20% of control ration) significantly (P<0.05) higher than those fed restricted ration (40% of control group), but no significant different with lambs fed ad libtium (control ration).…”
Section: Productive Performancesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the depression in feed conversion with calves fed restricted ration (T4) could be attributed to the higher CF content and lower digestibility of OM than those fed the other restricted rations and control one. These findings are in agreement with those obtained by Sayed (2009), Gaafar et al (2009), Neto et al (2011, Adeleye et al (2011), Abbasi et al (2012) and Malisetty et al (2014), who concluded that feed conversion improved with increasing energy level in the diets. Results here are in contrary with those obtained by Sami et al (2016) who found that Najdi lambs fed restricted ration (20% of control ration) significantly (P<0.05) higher than those fed restricted ration (40% of control group), but no significant different with lambs fed ad libtium (control ration).…”
Section: Productive Performancesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Also, data in Table 1 showed that DM, OM, CP, EE and NFE contents decreased and CF and ash contents increased with decreasing the levels of concentrate mixture in all restricted rations (T2, T3 and T4) than that of control ration (T1, unrestricted ration). The Results here are similar with those reported by (Mostafa et al, 1993, Gaafar et al, 2009, Mehrez et al, 2001and El-Ashry et al, 2011and Malisetty et al, 2014 who concluded that increasing CFM levels in the rations led to an increase in OM, CP and NFE contents with decrease CF content.…”
Section: Chemical Composition Of Ingredients and Rationssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data in Table (3) indicated that increasing the proportion of concentrate in the diet significantly (p <0.05) increased the digestibility of DM, OM, CP, CF, EE and NFE. Similarly, the percentage of digestible crude protein (DCP), and total digestible nutrients (TDN) were significantly increased in high concentrate diets (A, B and C) in comparison with diet D. This result was coincided with the findings observed by previous investigation carried out by Cantalapiedra-Hijar et al (2009), Saini et al, (2012), Kumari et al, (2012), Ma et al (2014) and Malisetty et al (2014). The decrease in nutrient digestion at 80 % concentrate level may be produced by the inhibition of cellulolytic bacteria growth caused by decreasing the rumen pH under 6.2 (Grant and Mertens, 1992).…”
Section: Nutrients Digestibilitysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The data in Table (3) indicated that increasing the proportion of concentrate in the diet significantly (p <0.05) increased the digestibility of DM, OM, CP, CF, EE, and NFE. Similarly, the percentage of digestible crude protein (DCP), and total digestible nutrients (TDN) were significantly increased in high concentrate diets (A, B and C) in comparison with diet D. This result was coincided with the findings observed by previous investigation carried out by Cantalapiedra-Hijar et al (2009), Saini et al (2012), Kumari et al, 2012, Ma et al 2014and Malisetty et al, 2014. The decrease in nutrient digestion at 80 % concentrate level may be produced by the inhibition of cellulolytic bacteria growth caused by decreasing the rumen pH under 6.2 (Grant and Mertens, 1992).…”
Section: Nutrients Digestibilitysupporting
confidence: 87%