2016
DOI: 10.1080/1065657x.2016.1202794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Feeding Regime on Composting in Bins

Abstract: Composting in bins is one of the most practical home composting methods. There is currently a need for greater information to improve the management of the composting process and to create home composting programs which ensure sustainable production of high quality compost. This study investigates how two aspects of the bin feeding regimethe feeding frequency and the amount of waste applied at each feedinfluence the process's evolution and the quality of the compost. Compost bins were assayed after introducing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C: N ratio (TOC: TKN ratio, in this study) has also been considered as a reference to assess compost stability, and it could be relevant to understand changes in the composting process. However, it is currently a controversial parameter and requires being complemented with other variables and indicators in order to evaluate the stability of a compost, as it is done in this study (Adhikari et al, 2012c;Karnchanawong and Suriyanon, 2011;Storino et al, 2016aStorino et al, , 2016b. Despite this considerations, other authors and environmental authorities have suggested a C: N ratio between 10 and 20 for defining compost stabilization (Mazzarino et al, 2012;Papadopoulos et al, 2009).…”
Section: Compost Stability Indicators and Quality Monitoring Variablesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The C: N ratio (TOC: TKN ratio, in this study) has also been considered as a reference to assess compost stability, and it could be relevant to understand changes in the composting process. However, it is currently a controversial parameter and requires being complemented with other variables and indicators in order to evaluate the stability of a compost, as it is done in this study (Adhikari et al, 2012c;Karnchanawong and Suriyanon, 2011;Storino et al, 2016aStorino et al, , 2016b. Despite this considerations, other authors and environmental authorities have suggested a C: N ratio between 10 and 20 for defining compost stabilization (Mazzarino et al, 2012;Papadopoulos et al, 2009).…”
Section: Compost Stability Indicators and Quality Monitoring Variablesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This suggests the need to carefully consider temperature average values (i.e. instead of the absolute minimum ones) as a reliable parameter to predict pathogen eradication in these systems, since sanitization requirements could not be reached in every sector of the composting mass, as it was previously observed in other decentralized composting experiences (Abdullah et al, 2013;Adhikari et al, 2012aAdhikari et al, , 2012bBarrena et al, 2014;Storino et al, 2016aStorino et al, , 2016b.…”
Section: Composting Temperature Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conditions for piles containing 25% cow dung are slightly better than piles containing 100% organic wastes. Compost moisture content had an influence on the temperature during the composting process, especially during the later stages of monitoring when the external temperature was higher (Storino et al 2016). …”
Section: Statistical Analysis Of the Measured Datamentioning
confidence: 99%