1994
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4488(94)90074-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of feeding on distribution of fatty acids at Sn-2-position in triacylglycerols of different adipose tissues in lambs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some researchers who believed C18:1 n 9 originated from biohydrogenation in the rumen regarded this as a response of the dietary forage/feed ratio. A higher proportion of C18:1 n 9 in lamb (with a concentrate-based diet) muscle fat was a result of the presence of a greater proportion of available carbohydrates, which reduced the stay of food in the rumen and decreased the biohydrogenation of the polyenoic fatty acids ( Petrova et al, 1994 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some researchers who believed C18:1 n 9 originated from biohydrogenation in the rumen regarded this as a response of the dietary forage/feed ratio. A higher proportion of C18:1 n 9 in lamb (with a concentrate-based diet) muscle fat was a result of the presence of a greater proportion of available carbohydrates, which reduced the stay of food in the rumen and decreased the biohydrogenation of the polyenoic fatty acids ( Petrova et al, 1994 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, fresh forage lipids are characterised by a predominance of C18:3, a precursor of the n-3 series, whereas concentrate contains relatively high levels of C18:2, precursor of the n-6 series (Petrova et al, 1994;Enser and Wood, 1995;Fisher et al, 2000;Velasco et al, 2001;Oriani et al, 2005). The fat of both grazing treatments (GR and GR+S) showed a higher proportion of C18:3 n-3 than their indoor counterparts (p < 0.05), and a lower proportion of C18:2 n-6 (Rowe Velasco et al, 2001;Santos-Silva et al, 2002b;Scerra et al, 2007;Nuernberg et al, 2008).…”
Section: Chemical Composition Of Meatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, some fatty acids taken with feed can be directly subjected to conversion in the rumen (conversion to CLA fatty acids) while some fatty acids of the C18: 0, C18: 1 and C18: 2 groups are not converted in the rumen but rather retained in muscle and fat tissues (Griinar et al, 2000;Díaz et al, 2002;Loor and Herbein, 2003;Manso et al, 2009, Vasta et al, 2008. On the other hand, Petrova et al, (1994) reported that the fatty acids taken with intense feeding ration did not stay long enough in the rumen for bio-hydrogenation; therefore the fatty acid composition of meat could be affected by that of the ration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%