Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of feed spacer induced membrane deformation on the performance of pressure retarded osmosis (PRO): Implications for PRO process operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
142
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
142
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous literatures [17,35], it was observed that the membrane deforms at a higher applied hydraulic pressure. Thus, the value of hydraulic permeability and solute permeability changes with the applied hydraulic pressure.…”
Section: P D Barmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In previous literatures [17,35], it was observed that the membrane deforms at a higher applied hydraulic pressure. Thus, the value of hydraulic permeability and solute permeability changes with the applied hydraulic pressure.…”
Section: P D Barmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The calculation of pressure dependent structure parameters in this paper were based on the assumption that the water and salt permeability were independent of the applied pressure, which may appear to be somewhat contradictory to part of the literature [18,19]. Nevertheless, our assumption is based on several arguments.…”
Section: Uncertainty In Experiments and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nevertheless, our assumption is based on several arguments. (1) In the presented work, the PRO experiments were performed with a tricot type feed spacer that has been found to result in the lowest variation in the modelled membrane parameters due to variations in transmembrane pressures [19], and (2) initial water permeability tests using pressures up to 10 bar were performed prior to all PRO experiments. Thus, any membrane deformation that could be expected to influence the skin properties of the membrane as a result of pressurisation should have occurred during the water permeability tests.…”
Section: Uncertainty In Experiments and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bench-scale FO setup was essentially the same as that used elsewhere [12] except for the membrane cell which has identical channels on each side; the dimensions are a length 85mm and a cross-sectional flow area of 39 mm by 2.3 mm. These experiments used membrane coupons cut from the spiral wound modules and spacer material was also cut and placed in the channels but skims to ensure a tight fit were not used.…”
Section: Bench-scale Set Up and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%