2017
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Feed Additives on Productivity and Campylobacter spp. Loads in Broilers Reared under Free Range Conditions

Abstract: The poultry reservoir, especially broiler meat, is generally recognized as one of the most-important sources for human Campylobacteriosis. The measures to control Campylobacter targeted essentially the primary production level. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatments against natural Campylobacter colonization in a French experimental farm of free-range broilers during the whole rearing period. Five commercial products and a combination of two of them were tested and all t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the same period there have been reports of less contaminated whole chicken in the UK, assessed by the testing of carcass neck skins purchased at retail. A great deal of effort has been expended by the poultry industry internationally to reduce contamination incidence and numbers of Campylobacter on broiler carcasses, particularly on farms (8)(9)(10)16). Although the farm biosecurity efforts are commendable, it is not clear at present why the reported reductions occurred and if the removal of a significant portion of neck skin has resulted in a greater proportion of a skin test sample being composed of less contaminated breast skin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the same period there have been reports of less contaminated whole chicken in the UK, assessed by the testing of carcass neck skins purchased at retail. A great deal of effort has been expended by the poultry industry internationally to reduce contamination incidence and numbers of Campylobacter on broiler carcasses, particularly on farms (8)(9)(10)16). Although the farm biosecurity efforts are commendable, it is not clear at present why the reported reductions occurred and if the removal of a significant portion of neck skin has resulted in a greater proportion of a skin test sample being composed of less contaminated breast skin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a French study, eight dietary treatments decreased colonization of Campylobacter , with a maximum mean reduction exceeding 2 log10 CFU/g (Guyard‐ Nicodème et al., ). In a subsequent study, a combination of a cation exchange clay‐based product in feed and an organic acid mixture (formic acid, sodium formate, lactic acid, propionic acid) in water resulted in a reduction of only 0.8 log CFU/g caecal content (Guyard‐Nicodème et al., ).…”
Section: Prevention Of Colonization and Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…()Mixture of ion‐exchanged clay in feed and organic acid in waterExperimental on free range broilers (78 day)0.820.2515 birdsGuyard‐Nicodème et al. ()Bacteriophage4 phage cocktail applied via drinking water, 5.8–7.5 log pfu dose per bird, 6–7 days before slaughter3 field trials using broilers under commercial conditions. Data (control and trial groups) have been provided for the 3 field trialsTrials 1, 2 & 2Treatment groups(trial number, days after application, mean faecal count t plus SD in brackets)1, 0, 2.4 (0.6)1, 1, < 1.8 (0)1, 6, 3.8 (0.5)2, 0, 3.1 (0.8)2, 1, 4.6 (0.4)2, 6, 5.9 (0.2)3, 0, 0.5 (0.7)3, 1, 4.6 (1.0)3,7, 0, 6.7 (0.2)Corresponding data for control groups1, 0, 1.2 (0.6)1, 1, 2.6 (0.7)1, 6, 7.0 (0.2)2, 0, 4.6 (0.7)2, 1, 4.7 (0.6)2, 6, 4.4 (1.0)3, 0, 2.7 (0.9)3, 1, 5.6 (0.6)3,7, 0, 4.5 (0.4)9 birds per each of the 3 trialsKittler et al.…”
Section: Appendix E – Studies On Effects Of Control Options On Broilementioning
confidence: 99%