2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6803.2000.tb00754.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Federal Reserve Policies on Bank Equity Returns

Abstract: We investigate the reaction of bank equity returns to changes in the relevant Federal Reserve (Fed) policy tool, which is the federal funds rate during periods of interest rate targeting and the discount rate during periods of reserves targeting. Three policy periods from 1974 to 1996 are investigated. We find that bank equity returns are inversely related to changes in the relevant Fed policy tool and that the degree of sensitivity of bank equity returns is conditioned on the direction of the change in the Fe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
37
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(29 reference statements)
4
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 This was followed by six more increases in Fed Funds, with the last one occurring in February 1995. Madura and Schnusenberg (2000) find that the share price response of banks can vary with the direction of the interest rate adjustment by the Fed. Furthermore, the thirteen consecutive reductions in the Federal Funds rate occurred over a period of weak economic conditions, whereas the period of seven consecutive increases in the Federal Funds rate occurred over a period of strong economic conditions, which could also affect bank equity returns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…6 This was followed by six more increases in Fed Funds, with the last one occurring in February 1995. Madura and Schnusenberg (2000) find that the share price response of banks can vary with the direction of the interest rate adjustment by the Fed. Furthermore, the thirteen consecutive reductions in the Federal Funds rate occurred over a period of weak economic conditions, whereas the period of seven consecutive increases in the Federal Funds rate occurred over a period of strong economic conditions, which could also affect bank equity returns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bonds returns, on the other hand, are affected by the term spread in restrictive policy periods and by the dividend yield during expansive periods. Madura and Schnusenberg (2000) report that bank equity returns rise significantly in response to Fed easing in both the pre-1979 and post-1987 funds rate targeting regimes, but do not respond significantly to Fed tightening. Therefore, how real estate returns react to positive versus negative inflationary changes (both expected and unexpected) in the presence of tightening and easing monetary policy actions, may be enlightening, not only as a study of market efficiency and information processing, but may also be at the crux of understanding the oft-noted anomalous relationship between inflation and securitized real estate returns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Madura and Schnusenberg (2000) find that stock returns for large banks (as measured by asset size) and banks with low capital ratios are more sensitive to monetary policy changes. The purpose of this article is to shed new light on how specific bank characteristics affect the responsiveness of bank stock returns to changes in the federal funds rate target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…23, 1755-1764, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2013 more sensitive to target changes than stocks of other industries. Madura and Schnusenberg (2000) test how monetary policy changes affect bank stock returns over . They find a strong inverse relationship between the Fed interest rate changes (the federal funds rate and the discount rate) and bank stock returns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%