2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01200.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of factor VIII concentrate on leucocyte cytokine receptor expression in vitro: relevance to inhibitor formation and tolerance induction

Abstract: Inhibitor formation in haemophilia patients receiving factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate is a serious problem requiring tolerance induction therapy. Inhibitor antibody formation is dependent on interactions between leucocyte cytokines with their corresponding receptors. To investigate this we studied the effect of FVIII on cytokine receptor expression using multiparameter flow cytometry and a whole blood stimulation assay. Upregulation of many cytokine receptors was inhibited by plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII) in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An accumulating pool of evidence from clinical observations suggests that VWF‐containing pdFVIII replacement products are associated with a lower incidence of inhibitor development especially when compared with currently commercialized rFVIII products manufactured from hamster cell lines [10,13,22–24]. In a systematic review of the literature, Wight and Paisley reported that the cumulative risk in PUPs treated with a single pdFVIII ranged from 0 to 12.4%, compared with 36–39% in PUPs treated with a single rFVIII; however, the authors noted that disparate testing schedules may account for some of the differences [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An accumulating pool of evidence from clinical observations suggests that VWF‐containing pdFVIII replacement products are associated with a lower incidence of inhibitor development especially when compared with currently commercialized rFVIII products manufactured from hamster cell lines [10,13,22–24]. In a systematic review of the literature, Wight and Paisley reported that the cumulative risk in PUPs treated with a single pdFVIII ranged from 0 to 12.4%, compared with 36–39% in PUPs treated with a single rFVIII; however, the authors noted that disparate testing schedules may account for some of the differences [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, comparing the results of those studies is problematic, as the study populations as well as study designs are heterogeneous. There are in vitro data concerning the immunomodulatory effects of pdFVIII [28–30], as well as the high concentration of FVIII:Ag and the reduced ability to bind exogenous VWF in recombinant FVIII products [25], differences that may influence inhibitor development. As the existing studies investigating inhibitor development cannot answer this question as to whether recombinant and pdFVIII products present differing risks for inhibitor development, there is a need for further investigations (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hodge et al showed that production of the T‐cell cytokines IL‐2, IL‐4, IL‐5 and TNF‐ α was reduced. IFN‐ γ and the monocyte cytokines TNF‐ α , IL‐1 α , IL‐1 β , IL‐6, IL‐8 and IL‐12 were inhibited in the presence of pdFVIII but not rFVIII in vitro [28,29]. In addition, Hodge and Han recently demonstrated a dose‐ and batch‐dependent immunomodulatory effect of an intermediate purity pdFVIII concentrate in an in vitro study: in the presence of pdFVIII, but not rFVIII, the up‐regulation of many cytokine receptors was inhibited on T cells, B cells, and monocytes [30].…”
Section: Hypothetical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results confirm and extend these observations at the peptide level, particularly regarding our observation of a change in the Ab specificity profile during the patient’s treatment (samples S2A and S2B). This production of inhibitors with different specificity could be caused by changes in treatment and usage of different factor concentrates (Orsini et al , 2005; Hodge et al , 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%