Effect of Facilitation on Practice Outcomes in the National Demonstration Project Model of the Patient-Centered Medical Home

Abstract

PURPOSE The objective of this study was to elucidate the effect of facilitation on practice outcomes in the 2-year patient-centered medical home (PCMH) National Demonstration Project (NDP) intervention, and to describe practices' experience in implementing different components of the NDP model of the PCMH.METHODS Thirty-six family practices were randomized to a facilitated intervention group or a self-directed intervention group. We measured 3 practice-level outcomes: (1) the proportion of 39 components of the NDP model that practices implemented, (2) the aggregate patient rating of the practices' PCMH attributes, and (3) the practices' ability to make and sustain change, which we term adaptive reserve. We used a repeated-measures analysis of variance to test the intervention effects.RESULTS By the end of the 2 years of the NDP, practices in both facilitated and self-directed groups had at least 70% of the NDP model components in place. Implementation was relatively harder if the model component affected multiple roles and processes, required coordination across work units, necessitated additional resources and expertise, or challenged the traditional model of primary care. Electronic visits, group visits, team-based care, wellness promotion, and proactive population management presented the greatest challenges. Controlling for baseline differences and practice size, facilitated practices had greater increases in adaptive reserve (group difference by time, P = .005) and the proportion of NDP model components implemented (group difference by time, P = .02); the latter increased from 42% to 72% in the facilitated group and from 54% to 70% in the self-directed group. Patient ratings of the practices' PCMH attributes did not differ between groups and, in fact, diminished in both of them.CONCLUSIONS Highly motivated practices can implement many components of the PCMH in 2 years, but apparently at a cost of diminishing the patient's experience of care. Intense facilitation increases the number of components implemented and improves practices' adaptive reserve. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the sustained and evolving effects of moving independent practices toward PCMHs Ann Fam Med 2010;8(Suppl 1):s33-s44.

State-of-the-Art Office-Based Interventions to Eliminate Youth Tobacco Use: The Past Decade

“…These include optimizing office design to facilitate workflow and communication among staff and creating practice-based care teams in which all practice staff work to facilitate patient well-being. 85,86 Training designated office staff to provide cessation counseling fits well with a care team approach. A national survey of primary care physician and practice factors found that having trained office staff available significantly increased physicians' advising patients to quit at each visit.…”

Patients Report Better Satisfaction with Part-Time Primary Care Physicians, Despite Less Continuity of Care and Access

“…We found empirical evidence consistent with the argument that full-time physicians provide better access and continuity of care. [9][10][11][12]16 However, contrary to much of the The physician was the unit of analysis. The left out variables include: % 19≤Age<35, % Non-Hispanic White, % PPO, and the Division Two Indicator.…”

“…[4][5][6][7] Part-time physicians have faced concerns about their ability to fulfill the goals of patient-centered primary care. 8 Continuity of care and care coordination may be compromised when physicians work less than full-time, [9][10][11] and part-time physicians "challenge traditional expectations about face-toface continuity of care between patient and physician." 12 Additionally, access and enhanced access, such as expanded hours and same-day appointments, 13,14 may be more difficult with reduced clinical hours.…”

Challenges Facing Primary Care Practices Aiming to Implement Patient-Centered Medical Homes

“…[8][9][10] In fact, the complexity underlying achievement of medical homes may be out of reach of many PC practices, 11 especially those without electronic health records, data systems, access to care managers, structured practice facilitation, and other key elements. [12][13][14][15] Findings from widely publicized medical home efforts, such as those at Geisinger, Intermountain and Group Health, suggest early provider burnout and significant challenges in operationalizing the tenets of PCMH in diverse settings, yet have nonetheless managed to accomplish important process and outcome changes. 16 We address these questions in the Veterans Health Administration (VA), the largest integrated healthcare delivery system in the U.S., with hospital-based and freestanding PC clinics spanning all 50 U.S. states and several territories.…”