1973
DOI: 10.1080/0002889738506822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Facial Hair on Respirator Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained in the present study are strongly supported by those reported in the literature [11,15,16,17,18,19,26]. The importance of having a beard in the Saudi population, due to either cultural or religious reasons, makes us recall Stobbe’s opinion that for a negative pressure respirator, facial hair is a health hazard and no beards should be permitted.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained in the present study are strongly supported by those reported in the literature [11,15,16,17,18,19,26]. The importance of having a beard in the Saudi population, due to either cultural or religious reasons, makes us recall Stobbe’s opinion that for a negative pressure respirator, facial hair is a health hazard and no beards should be permitted.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Hair that interferes with the sealing of a respirator places it in question as a protective device, and the individual wearing the respirator cannot expect the same kind of performance as someone who is clean shaven. For instance, Hyatt, et al [15] studied facial hair and respirator performance in which subjects with beards were investigated. They found that wearers with different amounts of hair, whether from stubble, sideburns, or beards, had an effect on the performance of the respirator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition severely reduces the efficiency of the respirators since facial hair interferes with proper sea1. 17 The presence of facial hair was not as common during the followup visit.…”
Section: B Arsenicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only four (7%} of the 54 specimens exceeded 20 ug/g creatinine. The highest urine arsenic concentration, 52 ug/g creatinine (not the worker with the split sample noted above), was in a parter who was sampled only one day. He had no detectable airborne arsenic exposure.…”
Section: Arsenicmentioning
confidence: 99%