2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Eyeglasses on Student Academic Performance: What Matters? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial in China

Abstract: Although eyeglasses have been considered a cost-effective way to combat myopia, the empirical evidence of its impacts on improving learning outcomes is inconsistent. This paper provides empirical evidence examining the effect of providing eyeglasses on academic performance between provinces with a different economic level in western China. Overall, we find a significant impact in Intention-to-Treat analysis and a large and significant local average treatment effect of providing free eyeglasses to students in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several papers reported results of RCTs offering school screening and free eyeglasses for primary grade students in the Chinese provinces Gansu and Shaanxi in 2012 and 2013. 12 , 14 , 47 The information provided in these papers was unclear on whether these three study populations represented separate or overlapping groups. We therefore report only the benefit-cost ratio associated with the median impact of these three studies; however including all three papers separately does not change the conclusion of this paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers reported results of RCTs offering school screening and free eyeglasses for primary grade students in the Chinese provinces Gansu and Shaanxi in 2012 and 2013. 12 , 14 , 47 The information provided in these papers was unclear on whether these three study populations represented separate or overlapping groups. We therefore report only the benefit-cost ratio associated with the median impact of these three studies; however including all three papers separately does not change the conclusion of this paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%