2004
DOI: 10.1080/09064700310019659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of extra maternal feed supply in early gestation on sow and piglet performance and production and meat quality of growing/finishing pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although significant differences were observed for pH and lightness at 45 min pm, other meat quality traits such as the ultimate pH, colour at 24 h, drip loss and carcass traits for Treatment EM offspring were unaffected by increased gestational feeding from 25 to 80 dg. This agrees with studies using a similar extended nutritional window (Nissen et al, 2003;Heyer et al, 2004) in which no difference in meat quality traits were seen between treatments. Increased gene expression of PPAR-d in deep and superficial ST, and decreased CAST in ST deep region with no observed phenotypic effect in carcass or meat quality when compared with control, indicate that many cellular factors contribute to phenotype expression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although significant differences were observed for pH and lightness at 45 min pm, other meat quality traits such as the ultimate pH, colour at 24 h, drip loss and carcass traits for Treatment EM offspring were unaffected by increased gestational feeding from 25 to 80 dg. This agrees with studies using a similar extended nutritional window (Nissen et al, 2003;Heyer et al, 2004) in which no difference in meat quality traits were seen between treatments. Increased gene expression of PPAR-d in deep and superficial ST, and decreased CAST in ST deep region with no observed phenotypic effect in carcass or meat quality when compared with control, indicate that many cellular factors contribute to phenotype expression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Indeed, a larger number of smaller or oxidative fibres can produce more favourable meat quality traits (more intense colour, optimum ultimate pH, less drip loss and improved tenderness of meat; Lengerken et al, 1997;Chang et al, 2003). However, some studies have found that increased maternal nutrition had no beneficial or even negative effects on growth, muscle fibres and meat quality of offspring (Nissen et al, 2003;Heyer et al, 2004). In addition Lawlor et al (2007), observed an increase in the number of piglets born dead due to increased feeding from 50 to 80 dg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from recent studies does not support any impact of increased feed intake in early or mid gestation on piglet birth weight (Heyer et al, 2004;Lawlor et al, 2007). However, increasing feed intake in late gestation has been shown to improve piglet birth weight (Cromwell et al, 1989;Shelton et al, 2009;Soto et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Increasing energy allowance between days 50 and 80 of gestation even increased the number of stillborn piglets per litter. In addition, Heyer et al (2004) found only marginal effects of increased maternal feed allowance from days 25 to 85 (135%, 170%, 1100%) on the growth, carcass quality and technological meat quality of the offspring. Birth weight and intra-litter variation were not influenced, whereas growth rate was negatively affected in the progeny of second parity sows, but these had higher numbers of weaned piglets.…”
Section: Consequences Of Maternal Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 88%