1977
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112077002493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of external disturbances on the spreading rate of a plane turbulent jet

Abstract: The nonlinear growth of turbulent jets documented by Kotsovinos (1976) is tentatively attributed to draughts in the laboratory, caused principally by the jet itself.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean velocity and fluctuation intensity profiles at and near the exit of the jet were checked to be axisymmetric. The jet discharges through the center of a 30 cm diameter disc into a large laboratory (15m x 30m x 3.5m) with controlled temperature, humidity, and traffic, so that the flow is essentially free from significant ambient recirculation and disturbances (Bradshaw 1977). The flow facility is schematically shown in the long-time space-time correlation is defined as:…”
Section: Apparatus and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean velocity and fluctuation intensity profiles at and near the exit of the jet were checked to be axisymmetric. The jet discharges through the center of a 30 cm diameter disc into a large laboratory (15m x 30m x 3.5m) with controlled temperature, humidity, and traffic, so that the flow is essentially free from significant ambient recirculation and disturbances (Bradshaw 1977). The flow facility is schematically shown in the long-time space-time correlation is defined as:…”
Section: Apparatus and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the few comparative experimental studies undertaken between free and impinging (non-swirling) jets, those in axisymmetric configurations by Donaldson and co-workers [81,82], Popiel and Trass [83] and Looney and Walsh [84] are, however, derived at varied conditions, which makes it difficult to draw summative observations on the fundamental effects of jet impingement, and swirl, on jet development. Contributing to this challenging task is the variety of inlet and boundary conditions employed [84][85][86], many of which are also not completely reported to facilitate modelling or be subject to secondary flow influences, such as recirculation arising from the unique characteristics of the particular apparatus used [81].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies undertaken over many years [12][13][14][15][16] have shown that the downstream development of a jet depends on the flow at the jet origin, often termed initial conditions. The analytical work of George 12 and experimental assessments on round and plane jets ͑e.g., Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%