2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of exposure to similar flavours in sensory specific satiety: Implications for eating behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate that expected satiety scores were associated with the actual presented meal, rather than whether it was a commercial ready-to-eat product or not, or based upon its sensory properties. Previous authors have shown that consumers have ideas about satiation for each kind of meal based on previous eating experiences [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results indicate that expected satiety scores were associated with the actual presented meal, rather than whether it was a commercial ready-to-eat product or not, or based upon its sensory properties. Previous authors have shown that consumers have ideas about satiation for each kind of meal based on previous eating experiences [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensory variety could reduce the effect of sensory-specific satiety by increasing the hedonic value of food during animal’s intake ( 29 , 30 ). However, there is a paucity of information about the effect of flavour variety on the feeding behaviour of nursery pigs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fits with the evolutionary perspective posited for sensory-specific satiety, as it psychologically allows being around a single source of water for a prolonged period whilst still enabling drinking to mitigate hypohydration. Palatability can also be conditioned upon repeated exposure, to either increase (Anguah et al, 2017;Gonzalez et al, 2018) or decrease (Siegel & Pilgrim, 1958) desire, depending on baseline pleasantness. Pleasantness is essentially (state) liking, encompassing the niceness of the oral sensations in the mouth, such as taste, rather than the pleasantness of actual ingestion (which is more akin to palatability) (Rogers & Hardmen, 2015).…”
Section: Pharmacological-thirst: Historical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%