2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61689-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

56
1,034
9
26

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,600 publications
(1,193 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
56
1,034
9
26
Order By: Relevance
“…They provide a location for exercise, social interaction, and reflection (Aldous 2007;Baur and Tynon 2010;Sugiyama et al 2010), and people with better access to urban parks live longer (Mitchell and Popham 2008), exercise more (Bai et al 2013;Thompson 2013), have better social cohesion (Kazmierczak 2013), and report better general health (van Dillen et al 2012). Public parks also provide important habitat for fauna and flora in an otherwise hostile urban landscape (Zhou and Chu 2012), and they have commonly been found to harbour much higher levels of biodiversity than the surrounding urban matrix (Matteson et al 2013;Strohbach et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide a location for exercise, social interaction, and reflection (Aldous 2007;Baur and Tynon 2010;Sugiyama et al 2010), and people with better access to urban parks live longer (Mitchell and Popham 2008), exercise more (Bai et al 2013;Thompson 2013), have better social cohesion (Kazmierczak 2013), and report better general health (van Dillen et al 2012). Public parks also provide important habitat for fauna and flora in an otherwise hostile urban landscape (Zhou and Chu 2012), and they have commonly been found to harbour much higher levels of biodiversity than the surrounding urban matrix (Matteson et al 2013;Strohbach et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, higher levels of neighborhood green space in low-income communities have been linked to lower levels of perceived stress and a steeper diurnal decline in cortisol secretion, 180,181 increased social contact, 182 improved mental health, 183,184 and lower all-cause mortality. 185 Although a social drift explanation (ie, people with mental health problems being more likely to move into poor neighborhoods) could at least partially explain some associations between the built environment and negative emotional states or poor mental health, it also has been shown that moving to less disadvantaged neighborhoods appears to decrease psychological distress. 186 Thus, economic, social, and physical environment factors appear to contribute to chronic negative psychological states, which may result in dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system 187 and associated increased blood pressure, greater adiposity, and insulin resistance (Biological Mechanisms section); increased likelihood of unhealthy behaviors (Behavioral Mechanisms section); additional chronic life stress [188][189][190][191][192][193][194][195][196] ; and the development and progression of CVD.…”
Section: Psychological Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68,117 For instance, percent of green cover within a residential area is a common measure, 85,118 although this measure may not reflect actual exposure to green space. Adults tend to spend between 60 and 70 % of their time at home 119 and the rest of their time at a work or other locations.…”
Section: Refinement Of Measures Of Green Space Nature Health and Smentioning
confidence: 99%