2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of exergaming versus combined exercise on cognitive function and brain activation in frail older adults: A randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frontal and subcortical-frontal cortex volumes are associated with single and dual-task gait performance in older adults with MCI ( Doi et al, 2017 ; Allali et al, 2019 ; Beauchet et al, 2019 ). Previous studies have shown evidence that VR and exergaming improve brain activation ( Liao et al, 2020 , 2021 ). Although we did not measure brain function, we suggest that EXER-TC improved brain plasticity in older adults with MCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frontal and subcortical-frontal cortex volumes are associated with single and dual-task gait performance in older adults with MCI ( Doi et al, 2017 ; Allali et al, 2019 ; Beauchet et al, 2019 ). Previous studies have shown evidence that VR and exergaming improve brain activation ( Liao et al, 2020 , 2021 ). Although we did not measure brain function, we suggest that EXER-TC improved brain plasticity in older adults with MCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of serious games was compared with conventional exercises in 6 studies [ 35 - 40 ]. While 3 studies did not find a statistically significant difference in global cognition between the groups [ 35 - 37 ], the 3 remaining studies showed a statistically significant difference in global cognition between the groups, favoring serious games over conventional exercises [ 38 - 40 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five studies assessed the safety of serious games by checking adverse events [ 34 - 38 ]. Of these, 2 studies did not find any adverse events of the interventions during the study period [ 37 , 38 ]. The 3 remaining studies spotted some adverse events, but they were comparable between groups [ 34 - 36 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the COVID-19 pandemic, central-based or home-based face-to-face supervision has been forced to stop, and we need an alternative delivery mode ( García Pérez de Sevilla et al, 2021 ). Remote assessment and guidance become the most feasible way ( Liao et al, 2021 ). Although compared with traditional training, there is no significant difference in remote supervision, but it reached the same benefits at least ( Geraedts et al, 2021 ; Gagnon et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%