2010
DOI: 10.1134/s1063784210050075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of evaporation conditions on the spatial redistribution of components in an evaporating liquid drop on a horizontal solid substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…w = 10 in all computation presented in this article. This choice gives us a good agreement with the calculated distribution at the end of the first stage of desiccation [25,26,27]. Notice, that f (0) ≈ C 0 and f (1) = 1.…”
Section: Parameters Of the Modelsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…w = 10 in all computation presented in this article. This choice gives us a good agreement with the calculated distribution at the end of the first stage of desiccation [25,26,27]. Notice, that f (0) ≈ C 0 and f (1) = 1.…”
Section: Parameters Of the Modelsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In general, the drop height should be lower, since we consider only the second stage of desiccation, when the volume fraction of the colloidal particles reaches the critical value of Φ g near the drop edge. Nevertheless, the experiments [31] as well as the simulations [22,27] show that the first stage lasts only about 10 % of desiccation time. Taking into account linear decreasing of the drop height, we can ignore the height change.…”
Section: Parameters Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The RMS deviation of the measured data of the drop height did not exceed unity. The law of a change in the height of distilled water droplets until complete evaporation retains a linear relationship [11][12][13]. The change in the height of nanofluid droplets with concentrations of 0.1% and 0.5% is linear over the main part of the evaporation time interval.…”
Section: Experimental Conditions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%