Effect of evaporation and mixing technique on die spacer thickness: A preliminary study

Die spacer thickness reproduction for central incisor crown fabrication with combined computer-aided design and 3D printing technology: An in vitro study

“…3, 10, 11, 12 and 13 Die spacer has been shown to improve the marginal fit between the restoration and tooth preparation, decreasing the risk of cement dissolution, plaque accumulation, recurrent caries, and periodontal problems. 14 The thickness of this die spacer affects the fracture strength of a ceramic restoration, its retention, and the marginal gap. 1, 2, 15 and 16 According to Tuntiprawon and Wilson, 15 ceramic crowns displayed a greater fracture strength when the mean internal gap at the axial wall was less than 73 μm.…”

Evaluation of the Luting Cement Space for Provisional Restoration by using Various Coats of Die Spacer Materials- An Invitro Study

“…Incomplete seating may result in occlusal interferences, discrepancy of marginal fit etc [12] Numerous articles which have touched upon are related to die spacing in cast restorations but die spacer application and its significance during provisional crowns and bridges fabrication were not studied exhaustively.…”

Effect of luting space and cements on retention of implant supported crowns fabricated by laser sintering

“…4,13,15 The luting space reduces elevation of the restoration during cementation, improves outflow of excess cement, and lowers seating force, enhancing fit and retention of the prosthesis. 18,19 It should be large enough to allow proper seating of the restoration without increasing the cement film thickness 20 ; it should also be uniform. 18 Grajower and Lewinstein 21 stated that "optimum fit" of a casting can be achieved only if the relief space allows for the cement film thickness and roughness of the tooth and casting surfaces.…”

“…18,19 It should be large enough to allow proper seating of the restoration without increasing the cement film thickness 20 ; it should also be uniform. 18 Grajower and Lewinstein 21 stated that "optimum fit" of a casting can be achieved only if the relief space allows for the cement film thickness and roughness of the tooth and casting surfaces. They recommended a relief space of 50 µm to be maintained on the die, including 30 µm for the cement film and 20 µm to compensate for distortion of the wax pattern.…”