2018
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.22992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ethanol on the antimicrobial properties of chlorhexidine over oral biofilm

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of 95% ethanol irrigation, with 5 or 10 min of action, on the antibacterial properties of 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), on oral biofilm, evaluated with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Oral biofilm development was induced in 80 sterilized bovine dentin blocks, distributed in two groups (5 or 10 min) and 4 subgroups, according to time and the solution used: Saline (SALINE5, SALINE10); Saline followed by CHX (SALINE/CHX5, SALINE/CHX10); Ethanol (ETHANOL5, ETHA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have proved that 95 % ethanol had antibacterial effects against mono-and multispecies biofilms as an endodontic irrigant [46]. In addition, ethanol can improve the sealing ability of the root canal obturation decrease the leakage as a final irrigant, and has no effect on endodontic irrigants' antimicrobial properties [47][48][49]. Our experiments also show that ethanol solutions at appropriate concentrations are not significantly cytotoxic to HDPs, indicating that ethanol is a suitable solvent for our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Previous studies have proved that 95 % ethanol had antibacterial effects against mono-and multispecies biofilms as an endodontic irrigant [46]. In addition, ethanol can improve the sealing ability of the root canal obturation decrease the leakage as a final irrigant, and has no effect on endodontic irrigants' antimicrobial properties [47][48][49]. Our experiments also show that ethanol solutions at appropriate concentrations are not significantly cytotoxic to HDPs, indicating that ethanol is a suitable solvent for our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The presence of 1,000 mM of ethanol inhibited the growth of oral streptococci (Figure 1), and incubating these bacteria with > 5,000 mM of ethanol for 10 min. seemed to abolish their viability (Figure 2), indicating that concentrated ethanol is bacteriostatic and bactericidal, as is well known [29,30,32] (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…On the other hand, ethanol is widely used as a disinfectant, as it is known to have bactericidal effects; i.e. it affects bacterial proliferation and viability [28][29][30][31]. However, it is unclear whether acetaldehyde is produced from ethanol by bacteria in the presence of the high concentrations of ethanol (≥5,000 mM) used in mouthwash and disinfectants [32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the ET has been recommended to remove the CSL derived from the ionic dissociation of CHX after its interaction with sodium hypochlorite, some irrigation protocols diverge at which time point the ET is used (Graziele Magro et al, 2014; Suman et al, 2015). When ET is used after the CHX, the volume of ET tends to dilute the CSL, mainly because of its polar and miscible characteristics in DW (Cecchin et al, 2011; Duarte et al, 2018; Krishnamurthy & Sudhakaran, 2010). However, in this study, the post‐space was irrigated with 95% ET before the use of CHX, favoring the formation of CSL (Magro et al, 2015; Nowicki & Sem, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethanol (ET) is a volatile and highly electronegative surfactant with a high diffusion capacity into the dentin (Krishnamurthy & Sudhakaran, 2010). Additionally, due to its characteristic of providing surface dehydration, it can interact with other irrigating solutions and substances, having different impacts on the precipitation of residues in the dentin (Cecchin et al, 2011; Duarte et al, 2018; Kuga et al, 2013). Due to these properties, its widespread use as an irrigation solution is not yet well established (Krishnamurthy & Sudhakaran, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%