2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation using SWEEPS and PIPS technique on dye penetration depth after root canal preparation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies investigating the debridement and cleaning efficacy of SWEEPS selected different apical preparation sizes ranging from 25/0.04 to 40/0.06 [35,[42][43][44][45]. However, these studies can only be compared to a limited extent since apical preparation size and taper affect flushing action, wall shear stress and irrigant replacement during syringe and ultrasonically activated irrigation [9,40,[46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies investigating the debridement and cleaning efficacy of SWEEPS selected different apical preparation sizes ranging from 25/0.04 to 40/0.06 [35,[42][43][44][45]. However, these studies can only be compared to a limited extent since apical preparation size and taper affect flushing action, wall shear stress and irrigant replacement during syringe and ultrasonically activated irrigation [9,40,[46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Akcay et al [156] investigated the effect of different agitation techniques on the dentinal tubule penetration of 5% NaOCl solution; the result demonstrated that PIPS was the most effective activation system followed by PUI, EA, and CNI, with statistical difference among the groups. In addition, it was reported that PIPS resulted in significantly greater penetration depth of irrigant into the dentinal tubules in the apical region compared to PUI, EDDY, CNI, and nonactivated control group [157,158]. This could be attributed to the capability of PIPS to create considerable fluid dynamics away from the laser tip [159].…”
Section: Penetrationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This could be attributed to the capability of PIPS to create considerable fluid dynamics away from the laser tip [159]. However, SWEEPS did not show additional effect on dentinal penetration of irrigant in the apical third compared to CNI, potentially compromising the dentin disinfection in this region [157,158].…”
Section: Penetrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After examining the effects of Er: YAG laser irradiation using the SWEEPS and PIPS techniques on dye penetration depth following root canal preparation, Kosarieh et al concluded that the results from the conventional and Sweeps techniques were comparable, while PIP had more effective penetration into dentinal tubules [21].…”
Section: Laser-activated Irrigation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%