2008
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.3415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of enzymes, flavor and organic acids on nutrient digestibility, performance and carcass traits of growing–finishing pigs fed diets containing dehydrated lucerne meal

Abstract: BACKGROUND: We recently determined that 150 g kg −1 of lucerne meal can be fed during the finishing period without detrimental effects on pig performance but lucerne should be limited to less than 75 g kg −1 during the growing period. Lucerne has a high fiber content, is poorly digested and contains antinutritional factors such as saponins which reduce palatability. Therefore, pig performance could be enhanced by supplementing lucerne-containing diets with feed additives such as flavors, enzymes or organic aci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because major variation of dietary fiber contents among treatments derived from IDF (Table 1 ), we deduced that differences observed in gut microbiota, SCFA, and gene expression may be due to the specific effect of alfalfa-derived IDF. The ADG and ADFI of pigs were not affected but the G:F was significantly increased by the addition of alfalfa meal, which was in agreement with previous studies [ 28 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Because major variation of dietary fiber contents among treatments derived from IDF (Table 1 ), we deduced that differences observed in gut microbiota, SCFA, and gene expression may be due to the specific effect of alfalfa-derived IDF. The ADG and ADFI of pigs were not affected but the G:F was significantly increased by the addition of alfalfa meal, which was in agreement with previous studies [ 28 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although pigs may have an apparent preference for diets containing feed flavours (Kennedy and Baldwin 1972;McLaughlin et al 1983;Glaser et al 2000), the results of the current study agree with other reports that suggest that where a choice is not available, there is little difference in diet consumption or performance between pigs fed sweetened or flavoured and non-sweetened and non-flavoured diets (Kornegay et al 1979;van Heugten 1999;Thacker and Haq 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We assume that repeating the experiment on a larger number of animals would enable us to tackle this issue. Second, individual characteristics, such as age or sex, may greatly influence the effects of feed additives on pigs' performance and feed intake (e.g., growing vs. finishing pigs; Thacker and Haq, 2009;Yan et al, 2011Yan et al, , 2012. Third, the period of exposure to the feed additive may also affect its impact on piglets' performance, and exposure to the additives from weaning might have been insufficient to see appreciable effects on growth and feed intake (Sulabo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%