1982
DOI: 10.1016/0301-6226(82)90008-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of environmental temperature and feeding level on energy balance traits of early-weaned piglets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The night temperature achieved in these trials and the overall average temperatures (table 6) were lower than the lower critical temperature reported by Nobler and LeDividich (1982) for pigs of similar size as those used in these experiments. They concluded that constant temperatures starting at 28 C and lowered 2 C/wk were close to the critical temperature pattern of 3-wkold, weaned pigs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The night temperature achieved in these trials and the overall average temperatures (table 6) were lower than the lower critical temperature reported by Nobler and LeDividich (1982) for pigs of similar size as those used in these experiments. They concluded that constant temperatures starting at 28 C and lowered 2 C/wk were close to the critical temperature pattern of 3-wkold, weaned pigs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…One of the reasons for this inconsistency may be due to the differences in BW at slaughter between heat-stressed and non-heat-stressed pigs. For example, results from some studies have shown that backfat was greater in pigs housed in heat-stress conditions compared with a non-heat-stress environment when pigs were slaugh-tered at a similar BW (Noblet and Le Dividich, 1982;Close and Stanier, 1984;Kouba et al, 2001). However, others have reported less or unchanged carcass fatness of heat-stressed pigs when pigs were slaughtered at a constant time period, which these authors attributed to the lighter BW of the heat-stressed pigs (Nienaber and Hahn, 1983;Giles et al, 1988;Rinaldo and Le Dividich, 1991).…”
Section: Carcass Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal environment in which a pig is maintained influences its voluntary feed intake, and therefore, the rate, efficiency and composition of gain (Verstegen et al, 1978;Noblet and LeDividich, 1982;Close and Stanier, 1984). Pigs kept in a cool environment (relative to thermoneutrality) consume more feed and are less efficient for growth because of their elevated energy demand to produce heat required for maintaining body temperature (Holmes and Close, 1977).…”
Section: Effects Of Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%