2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of entropy change of lithium intercalation in cathodes and anodes on Li-ion battery thermal management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
187
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 334 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
187
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the net heat generation in the LTO cells is much lower, which makes the LTO cell a potential candidate for a cell with higher thermal safety, even during very fast charging (within less than 30 min). It was also found that the entropy change is insignificant in an LTO based commercial full cell [22]. These properties were reflected in the surface temperature profile of the LTO cell (see Figure 7).…”
Section: Continuous Charge and Dischargementioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the net heat generation in the LTO cells is much lower, which makes the LTO cell a potential candidate for a cell with higher thermal safety, even during very fast charging (within less than 30 min). It was also found that the entropy change is insignificant in an LTO based commercial full cell [22]. These properties were reflected in the surface temperature profile of the LTO cell (see Figure 7).…”
Section: Continuous Charge and Dischargementioning
confidence: 90%
“…At the cathode, these changes are based on the ratio of lithium and other elements (e.g., Cobalt) at the cathode. Additionally, at the anode, these changes are based on the ratio of lithium and carbon during intercalation/deintercalation of lithium [20][21][22]. However, at a higher current rate, the contribution of irreversible heat (i.e., polarization resistance heat and ohmic resistance heat) becomes dominant.…”
Section: Cell Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be able to do so, we kept the thickness of the components constant and used the same XALT separator for all cells (see Table 4, k s a.m. = 0.21 Wm −1 K −1 ). In addition to the NMC | graphite cell, which we modelled before, we showed the maximum temperature rise as function of the C-rate (discharge) of an LCO | graphite cell (overall entropy change of −35 J mol·K [35]) and a LFP | graphite cell (overall entropy change of −9 J mol·K [35]). In case of the LFP | graphite and the LCO | graphite cell, we used the graphite anode from Hohsen.…”
Section: Temperature Profile Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We used an entropy change of −9 J mol·K [35] for the NMC | graphite cell. According to Burheim et al [18], we assumed an ohmic resistance of 2mΩ · m 2 and an overpotential of η = −0.042 + 0.067 · log(j).…”
Section: Temperature Profile Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences are cell dependent and are functions of the SOC. This approach is described extensively by Viswanathan et al (Viswanathan et al, 2009). They have also published data for various cell types in the same paper.…”
Section: Battery Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%