Effect of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Lithotomy Combined with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Pain and Prognosis of Patients with Gallstones and Extrahepatic Bile Duct Stones

Abstract

Objective. The researchers aim to assess how endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography lithotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy affected pain and prognosis in individuals with gallstones and extrahepatic bile duct stones. Methods. Researchers studied 100 persons with gallstones and extrahepatic bile duct stones from January 2016 to August 2021. They were split into two groups: control and observation. The control group underwent open cholecystectomy + choledocholithotomy + T-tube drainage. There were ERCP + lithotomy + Laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures conducted on the observation group of patients (LC). The operation time, incision size, and bleeding volume; stone clearance rate and stone recurrence rate; visual analogue scale (VAS); Eating time, exhaust time, out of bed activity time, and postoperative hospital stay; the two groups’ difficulties were contrasted and studied. Results. The observation group’s operation duration was much longer than the control group’s, and the incision size and bleeding volume were significantly reduced in the observation group. When it came to recurrence, there was a significant difference between the observation group (2.0%) and the control group (4.0%), even though stone clearance did not differ substantially (20.00%). The VAS scores 3 and 7 days after surgery were significantly different between the observation and control groups. The observation group’s eating time, exhaustion, activity time, and postoperative hospital stay were much shorter than the control group’s; complications occurred at a lower rate (20%) in the observation group than in the control group (34%). Conclusion. When gallstones and extrahepatic bile-duct stones are removed using laparoscopic lithotomy and laparoscopic cystoscopy (LC), the operation indices are improved and the risk of recurrence of stones is reduced and reducing the occurrence of complications, all of which improve patient outcomes and deserve to be considered a clinical reference.

Comparison of the clinical effects of dual-modality endoscopy and traditional laparotomy for the treatment of intra- and extrahepatic bile duct stones

“…In addition, the surgical operator has a larger and clearer surgical field of view under dual-modality endoscopy treatment, which is conducive to shortening the surgical process to some extent[ 24 ]. In the research by Zhao et al [ 25 ], duodenoscopy plus laparoscopy showed better performance than laparotomy in the treatment of gallstones and extrahepatic BDSs, which was mainly reflected by less IBL, fewer postoperative complications, shorter time to postoperative oral food intake, less fatigue, shorter time to ambulation, shorter postoperative hospitalization time, and faster postoperative recovery, which is similar to our research results. According to the serum inflammatory marker data, the TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 Levels in the research group were significantly lower than those in the pretreatment and control groups, suggesting the significant inhibitory effect of duodenoscopy plus laparoscopy on the serum inflammatory markers in patients with intra- and extrahepatic BDSs.…”

Retracted: Effect of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Lithotomy Combined with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Pain and Prognosis of Patients with Gallstones and Extrahepatic Bile Duct Stones

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi, as publisher, following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of systematic manipulation of the publication and peer-review process.…”