1990
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.28.6.1108-1113.1990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method

Abstract: zyme tested exactly as specified by the manufacturer. The effects (if any) of procedural alterations (necessary to determine specimen quality) on detection of C. trachomatis antigen from the other specimen were then established.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were 319 cervical specimens, 204 (63.9%) of which were graded as adequate by using the criteria of Kellogg et al (18,20,21). There were a total of 34 (10.7%) positive specimens by the DFA and/or the PCR assay (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There were 319 cervical specimens, 204 (63.9%) of which were graded as adequate by using the criteria of Kellogg et al (18,20,21). There were a total of 34 (10.7%) positive specimens by the DFA and/or the PCR assay (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study appeared to indicate, but did not definitively prove, that the same swab could be used to ascertain the adequacy of the cervical specimen before it is placed into the PCR transport medium for swirling. Other methods besides the DFA test have been used to assess the cellular components of the specimen; these include the Papanicolaou stain and Diff-Quick (Baxter Diagnostics, Inc., McGaw, Ill.) (18)(19)(20)(21). These methods are less costly and easier to use in a routine clinical laboratory than the DFA test, which requires an experienced microscopist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Voraussetzung fur die Verknupfung der beiden Bedingungen war, den 'cut-off' des ELISA anhand der OD der prainkubierten Proben nach der oben aufgefuhrten Formel zu berechnen (TIJSSEN, 1985). (HIPP et al, 1987;KELLOGG et al, 1990;MARDH et al, 1990;MONCADA et al, 1990;MILLS et al, 1992;OLSEN und SAMBOL, 1993;WARREN et al, 1993) (MILLS et al, 1992).…”
Section: Materials Und Methodenunclassified