2005
DOI: 10.1653/0015-4040(2005)088[0083:eoeaha]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Elevation and Host Availability on Distribution of Sterile and Wild Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2004b) on the spatial patterns of medfly in managed citrus plantations, that of Israely et al. (2005) on the spatial patterns of the medfly in a relatively large area of central Israel, and that of Puche et al. (2005) on the effect of elevation on medfly captures in Guatemala.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2004b) on the spatial patterns of medfly in managed citrus plantations, that of Israely et al. (2005) on the spatial patterns of the medfly in a relatively large area of central Israel, and that of Puche et al. (2005) on the effect of elevation on medfly captures in Guatemala.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One apparent difference between the 2 species with regard to site occupancy and detection as surveyed in this test is that of aggregation or clumped distributions. The distributions of natural fruit fly populations have been shown to be aggregated (Meats 2007;Puche et al 2005;Zalucki et al 1984). The sterile C. capitata males surveyed in this test were artificially distributed evenly on a weekly basis and as already noted, had very high site occupancy estimates (·).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In Mexico, the pest was eradicated in 1982 (Enkerlin et al., 2015), but it continuously re‐enters because it has established in Guatemala. The inflows are caused by its permanence in Guatemala, the annual unimodal distribution of the pest (Midgarden et al., 2014), its natural dispersion (Midgarden & Lira, 2008; Midgarden et al., 2014), movement by humans transporting the pest within fruit (Enkerlin et al., 2015), dispersion due to intraspecific competition for resources resulting from high population densities combined with changes in host fruit availability (Puche et al., 2005) and meteorological phenomena such as high wind speeds during storms (Enkerlin et al., 2015). The Mexican government, through the Moscamed Program, has successfully applied quarantine phytosanitary measures in the state of Chiapas, which keeps the country free of the pest (Enkerlin et al., 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%