2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of elevated temperature on alkali-activated geopolymeric binders compared to portland cement-based binders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
50
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The SFB's strength increased with the heat-curing temperature rose, when the temperature was below 90 • C [20], indicating that the binders are applicable for the 85 • C geothermal environment [2,21]. Additionally, the cement containing slag also exhibited a better compressive strength and water permeability than the Portland cement [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The SFB's strength increased with the heat-curing temperature rose, when the temperature was below 90 • C [20], indicating that the binders are applicable for the 85 • C geothermal environment [2,21]. Additionally, the cement containing slag also exhibited a better compressive strength and water permeability than the Portland cement [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The geopolymer gained popularity because of the potential low CO 2 emission and energy efficiency during its manufacturing compared to conventional cement [3,4]. Moreover, the superior thermal stability of geopolymer compared to Portland cement has also increased the interest in that material for high-temperature applications [5]. However, this characteristic is closely related to the type of aluminosilicate used as well as the synthesis conditions [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual pores contribute to the porosity, so there is a need to understand the type of pores present in concrete. The pores are classified into two categories (a) gel pore, capillary pores, entrapped and entrained pores are characteristics of pores, while(b) macro pores, micro pores, meso pores, and larger pores are categorized according to the sizes of pores (Vodák et al 2004;Rivera et al 2016). Many techniques are available to determine the porosity in concrete such as pressure method, air-void analyzer, stereoscopic and microscopic methods (Moravcová et al 2016), torrent permeability tester (Kucharczyková et al 2010), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) method widely used by researchers (Piasta et al 1984;Abell et al 1999;Chan et al 1999;Diamond 2000;Lee et al 2017), ultrasound method (Benouis and Grini 2011), water vapor adsorption, nitrogen adsorption (Moravcová et al 2016); but the limitation of these tests is that they assume that the pore geometry is regular and all the pores are interconnected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%