2016
DOI: 10.1134/s2075113316020040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of electron irradiation on the formation and healing of defects in carbon nanotubes

Abstract: The effect of electron irradiation with E = 2 MeV and a dose of 1.9 × 10 17 el/cm 2 of annealed and pristine carbon nanotubes (CNTs) on the electrical conductivity σ(ρ), thermoelectric emf (α), and elastic characteristics during deformation and relaxation during unloading is studied. The annealing of CNTs at 800°C removes the topological defects (the Stone-Wales ones, vacancies, and adatoms) which distort the CNT shape. As is found, after electron irradiation with small doses (0.63 × 10 17 el/cm 2 ), the defec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that low-energy X-ray irradiation of graphene in oxygen environments can lead to the formation of oxygen-related defects 43 45 . Although radiation-induced healing of nanomaterials has been reported 46 , such an effect has not been observed with γ-rays, specifically not with such remarkable consequences. It is known that the most common defects in exfoliated TMD materials are chalcogen vacancies 47 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that low-energy X-ray irradiation of graphene in oxygen environments can lead to the formation of oxygen-related defects 43 45 . Although radiation-induced healing of nanomaterials has been reported 46 , such an effect has not been observed with γ-rays, specifically not with such remarkable consequences. It is known that the most common defects in exfoliated TMD materials are chalcogen vacancies 47 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An increase in photoluminescence and carrier lifetime is very surprising: Initially it was expected that radia-tion could lead to the formation of new defects, but not to defect healing. Although radiation-induced healing of nanomaterials has been reported 35 , such an effect has not been observed with γ-rays, specifically not with such remarkable consequences. It is known that the most common defects in exfoliated TMD materials are chalcogen vacancies 36 .…”
Section: Backtracing Of Healing Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Electrophysical properties are study by the method described in [19]. The powder samples are placed in a dielectric cylinder under a well-conductive piston, which also plays a role of upper electrode; the metallic bottom of the cylinder is the second electrode.…”
Section: Materials and Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important role in this case is played by defects that arise both during the synthesis (growth) and under external influences (deformation, radiation irradiation, etc.). They deflect the shape of nanotubes from linear, change the concentration of charge carriers, and the position of the Fermi level as well as the conditions of current passing [14]. In the case of CNTs contact with a metal, it becomes possible to transfer electrons between the components, which affects the electrical conductivity of nanotubes and the composite on their basis, since the contribution of each of the components will depend on the carrier concentration and their mobility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a low concentration of electrons in the CNTs makes it possible to easily control the position of the Fermi level: to shift it deep into the valence band with a decrease in the conduction electron concentration or, conversely, into the conduction band, if the metal work function is lower than the work function of CNTs. Methodical point of our investigation [14,15] consists in the use of the CNTs/metal array (mechanical mixture of nanotubes and powder metal, which has the work function smaller than the work function of CNTs). As a result, the electrical conductivity of an array has reached higher values than the corresponding value of each of the components separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%