2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of electron donor source on the treatment of Cr(VI)-containing textile wastewater using sulfate-reducing fluidized bed reactors (FBRs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the literature, the kinetic constants obtained in this study are higher than those previously reported under similar, but not identical conditions. [19,20] In this case, the cited reports presented operating conditions that did not include either a low initial pH or the addition of metals. In contrast, our results agree with another report from Camiloti et al, [21] in which copper is added under neutral conditions.…”
Section: Kinetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the literature, the kinetic constants obtained in this study are higher than those previously reported under similar, but not identical conditions. [19,20] In this case, the cited reports presented operating conditions that did not include either a low initial pH or the addition of metals. In contrast, our results agree with another report from Camiloti et al, [21] in which copper is added under neutral conditions.…”
Section: Kinetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Cirik et al and Sahinkaya et al [19,20] have studied sulfate removal, including metal precipitation, from synthetic AMD in batch reactors and fluidized bed reactors, respectively. The first work reported pH elevation from 4.0 to 8.0 and 100% of chromium removal by sulfide precipitation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…S3 in Supplementary data). R m was calculated according to Equation 1 by filtering pure water through a new membrane and then R f was calculated using Equation 4. R f can also be divided as irreversible (R irv ) and irrecoverable (R irc ) fouling resistances.…”
Section: Characterization Of Membrane Foulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological reduction of Cr(VI) is an eco-friendly and cost-effective method for remediation of Cr(VI) contamination (Sugiyama et al 2012;Cirik et al 2013). Many new microorganisms that catalyze Cr(VI) to Cr(III) have been isolated from sludge, wastewater, landfill, and soil since the capability of Cr(VI) reduction was first reported on Pseudomonas species in 1977 (Romanenko and Koreńkov 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%