1992
DOI: 10.1136/gut.33.6.791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of electrohydraulic and extracorporeal shock waves on gastrointestinal cancer cells and their response to cytotoxic agents.

Abstract: This spark results in the dielectric breakdown of water in the area of the probe, which generates an initial shock wave and a gas bubble. When the initiation bubble collapses, a second pressure wave is produced."Cells were placed in a polyurethane tube and allowed to form a pellet. A 5 Fr probe was placed just below the surface of the culture fluid (this was found to contain sufficient electrolytes for shock wave generation) and cells received either 0, 1, 10, or 20 shocks at 150 V.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other mechanisms might be active as well since a slightly enhanced effect of another drug was noted even when it was added 24 hours after shock wave administration (Oosterhof et al 1989). A similar effect was found by another group, however in only one out of a number of cell lines (Warlters et al 1992). …”
Section: In Vitro Actionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Other mechanisms might be active as well since a slightly enhanced effect of another drug was noted even when it was added 24 hours after shock wave administration (Oosterhof et al 1989). A similar effect was found by another group, however in only one out of a number of cell lines (Warlters et al 1992). …”
Section: In Vitro Actionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The in vitro effects of shock waves are due to a suppression of cell proliferation correlated with an apoptotic cell death process; moreover, HESW treatment has been shown to cause a transient increase in cell membrane permeability by opening micropores (such as electroporation), allowing higher intracellular drug concentration (12-16). This effect has been shown as being capable of increasing the cytotoxicity of various chemotherapeutic agents on different tumour types, allowing treatments with lower doses of drugs in vitro (17)(18)(19), in vivo in animal models (12,20) and in one patient with prostate cancer (21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vitro effects of shock waves are due to a suppression of cell proliferation correlated with an apoptotic cell death process; moreover, HESW treatment has been shown to cause a transient increase in cell membrane permeability by opening micropores (such as electroporation), allowing higher intracellular drug concentration (12-16). This effect has been shown as being capable of increasing the cytotoxicity of various chemotherapeutic agents on different tumour types, allowing treatments with lower doses of drugs in vitro (17)(18)(19), in vivo in animal models (12,20) and in one patient with prostate cancer (21).This evidence led us to study the effects of HESW on OS cell lines and how to enhance cytotoxicity with a combined therapy with HESW and doxorubicin (DOXO) or methotrexate (MTX). These cytotoxic agents have been chosen since their well-known activity against OS and their routine use in clinical protocols for the treatment of OS patients (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research groups have found some toxicity of shockwaves to tumours in animal models (Oosterhof et al, 1991;Russo et al, 1986;1987). Others have shown that shockwaves could enhance cytotoxicity when cells were shortly incubated with the drugs during shock wave exposure (Gambihler & Delius, 1992;Warlters et al, 1992). In previous works, we showed that the combination of conventional shockwaves with gas microbubbles could: (1) induce a blockade of the growth of human colon cells in culture and eradicate cell proliferation from solid colic tumours treated in vitro (Prat et al, 1991b); (2) potentiate the cytotoxicity of FUra in HT-29 cells (Prat et al, personal communication).…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%