2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00086-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of elbow flexion on upper extremity impact forces during a fall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elbow flexion observed in this study contributed to the reduction in velocity during forward falls and is consistent with previous studies (Chou et al, 2001;Ashton-Miller, 2002, 2003;Kim and Ashton-Miller, 2003). Elbow flexion during forward falls was also shown to influence the force profile after impact and reduce fracture risk.…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The elbow flexion observed in this study contributed to the reduction in velocity during forward falls and is consistent with previous studies (Chou et al, 2001;Ashton-Miller, 2002, 2003;Kim and Ashton-Miller, 2003). Elbow flexion during forward falls was also shown to influence the force profile after impact and reduce fracture risk.…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Fracture risks were shown in previous studies to be influenced by parameters such as impact velocity van den Kroonenberg et al, 1996) and elbow angle (Chou et al, 2001;. Other biomechanical variables that could influence fracture risk but were not measured in the current study include (a) impact force (Chiu and Robinovitch, 1998), (b) wrist flexion/ extension and (c) forearm pronation/supination.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cartilage material properties were assigned based on the assumption that the model would simulate an impact during which the peak force occurs approximately 30 ms after initial contact (Chou et al, 2001;Reed-Troy and Grabiner, 2005). At this rapid loading rate, cartilage appears nearly incompressible (Stolz et al, 2004), thus n ¼ 0.49 was assigned.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6a). 20,21,26,27,61,71,73 (See Appendix B for the details of the F GR calculation.) In the case of the lumbar spine static lift model, we compared the BFxRM predictions of F GR to four experimental studies in which F GR was measured during a drop landing (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%