Effect of educational intervention on awareness of pharmacovigilance among medical undergraduates in a tertiary care teaching hospital

Abstract

Aim: (1) To assess the knowledge and attitude of undergraduates about adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting at a tertiary care teaching hospital. (2) To assess the effect of educational intervention among medical undergraduates on knowledge and attitude about pharmacovigilance (PV). Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Respondents were 192 undergraduate students (2 nd year). The study instrument was a self-developed, prevalidated semi-structured questionnaire. Participants were given 1 h to complete the questionnaire. After this, a 2 h lecture about PV was taken. Participants were asked to fill the same questionnaire after the educational intervention. Pre- and post-test questionnaire were compared. Results: There was an overall improvement in all three aspects, i.e., awareness, knowledge, and attitude. Most of the students had knowledge of the meaning of PV and reporting of ADR by doctors. However, there was a significant improvement in the knowledge regarding reporting of ADR by dentist, nurses, and pharmacist. Similarly, students were aware of the fact that ADR with allopathic medicines should be reported, but postintervention, there was improvement in percentage regarding reporting of ADR in the case of herbal and traditional medicine, blood products, and biological and medical device. There was a significant improvement in percentage regarding awareness about process of reporting ADR after exposure to lecture. Conclusion: There is a need of increasing awareness among the medical students to improve the reporting of ADRs. Adequate consideration needs to be given to the subject of ADRs in the clinical pharmacology and therapeutics curricula in undergraduate medical education.

Impact of Educational Intervention on Knowledge, Attitude & Practice About Pharmacovigilance in Nursing Students in A Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in India: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…Additionally, an understanding of the mutual benefits of ADR reporting for both doctors and patients was notable, which is also similar to a study by Kalikar et al [13].…”

“…In this study, the professional obligation of reporting an adverse drug reaction (ADR), was evaluated but it was not statistically significant. This finding was in contrast to the study by Kalikar et al where 70.31% participants felt that ADR reporting should be a professional obligation postintervention as compared to 55.2% before intervention" [13].…”

“…Pre-intervention, the respondents were of the opinion that ADR reporting has to be done only for allopathic medicines, which is similar to the findings reported by Kalikar et al [13]. Following the educational intervention, the respondents' conception of themselves was altered.…”

“…Therefore, ADRs for all medications must be reported. A study by Kalikar et al reported that 94% of residents were more likely to report an adverse drug reaction (ADR) if it involved a new medication [13]. The majority of participants' awareness regarding the critical role played by medical students in ADR reporting was also encouraging.…”

“…The questionnaire was validated by circulating it to a panel of 10 experts in the field of Pharmacovigilance (PV) and suggested modifications were done. It was a self developed, validated, semi-structured questionnaire consisting of open and close-ended questions regarding knowledge, attitude and practice about pharmacovigilance was adapted [13][14][15][16][17].…”