Effect of EDTA conditioning on cervical restorations bonded with a self-etch adhesive: A randomized double-blind clinical trial

Evaluation of microleakage in class V composite restorations using dye penetration and micro-CT

“…Retention is the most critical parameter in treatment of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) [13]. Therefore, increased efforts were made to improve the bonding effectiveness in the cervical lesions [11,31]. In order to investigate and assess marginal adaptation of dental restorations, a large variety of different laboratory test methods exist.…”

“…All of them are in vitro models because an accurate in vivo evaluation of the interface between restoration and dental tissue is not possible. The clinical examination is mostly limited to the evaluation of marginal staining and marginal adaptation according to the USPHS criteria [11][12][13][14].…”

The use of FDI criteria in clinical trials on direct dental restorations: A scoping review

“…The most employed criteria were: marginal adaptation (criterion 6; 29 studies, i.e. 96.7% of the studies) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], staining (criterion 2; 27 studies, i.e. 90.0% of the studies) [9-18, 20-23, 25-30, 32-38], fracture of material and retention (criterion 5;…”

“…Most of them investigated the performance of composite resins (flowable or not, silorane) [16,23,37] and/or the procedures i.e with chlorhexidine pre-treatment [32], with or without bevel [13,14], with rubber dam or cotton rolls/retraction cord [26], with various polishing systems [21] and/or the indications (for non-carious cervical lesion, for primary teeth, in anterior or posterior position) [9-11, 18, 20, 31, 34-36]. Many other studies evaluated the performance of various adhesive types (etch and rinse, self-etch or universal) [27,30,33] and/or the procedure (with EDTA conditioning) [28] and/or the indications (for non-carious cervical lesions) [12,15,17,38]. Finally, other materials and techniques, such as the GIC [24] or the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique were examined [19].…”

Influência de tratamento dentinário com EDTA sobre a resistência de união de sistemas adesivos autocondicionantes

“…A avaliação da influência do pré-tratamento da dentina com EDTA em duas diferentes concentrações não mostrou diferença significativa do grupo que não recebeu esse tratamento, o que difere do estudo de Luque-Martinez et al 19 , que mostraram uma retenção significantemente maior no grupo tratado com EDTA em relação ao grupo controle, quando avaliaram performance clínica de restaurações cervicais por 18 meses, realizadas com sistemas adesivos autocondicionantes, devido a esta substância (EDTA) produzir uma dissolução seletiva da hidroxiapatita. Os mesmos autores 19 sugerem que a preservação da interface dentina-resina com o pré tratamento dentinário com EDTA seja mais resultante do efeito de condicionamento suave do substrato do que pelo efeito inibidor de MMPs, embora o efeito de inibir a ação das MMPs na degradação da camada híbrida seja conhecido na literatura 11 . O fato de o EDTA desmineralizar superficialmente e de ter sido utilizado neste estudo de forma passiva pode ter influenciado o resultado semelhante ao grupo sem tratamento.…”