2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5368-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ecological restoration and climate change on ecosystems: a case study in the Three-Rivers Headwater Region, China

Abstract: The Three-Rivers Headwater Region (TRHR) is the headwater of the Yangtze River Basin (YARB), Yellow River Basin (YRB), and Lancang River Basin (LRB); it is known as China's 'Water Tower' owing to its important supply of freshwater. In order to assess ecosystem changes in the TRHR during 2000-2012, we systematically and comprehensively evaluated a combination of model simulation results and actual observational data. The results showed the following: (1) Ecosystem pattern was relatively stable during 2000-2010,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, implementation of the ecological restoration programs has increased vegetation coverage and mitigated further degradation of the grasslands (also reported by Cai et al 2015). However, due to ecological fragility of the area, the grasslands with low and very low vegetation coverage is still vulnerable to both natural and human disturbance (Jiang and Zhang 2016, Sun et al 2016, Shao et al 2017. Spatial variations of vegetation coverage change were observed among the counties studied (figure 2 and supplementary appendix figure S2).…”
Section: Impact Of Restoration Approaches On Vegetation Coverage Changementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore, implementation of the ecological restoration programs has increased vegetation coverage and mitigated further degradation of the grasslands (also reported by Cai et al 2015). However, due to ecological fragility of the area, the grasslands with low and very low vegetation coverage is still vulnerable to both natural and human disturbance (Jiang and Zhang 2016, Sun et al 2016, Shao et al 2017. Spatial variations of vegetation coverage change were observed among the counties studied (figure 2 and supplementary appendix figure S2).…”
Section: Impact Of Restoration Approaches On Vegetation Coverage Changementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Observation points for each variable at the small watershed scale were selected for 1988, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2008, and 2012. Grassland NPP data for each small watershed within the TRHR were obtained from the Remote Sensing Monitoring Atlas for the Qinghai River Headwaters Ecosystem 34 , while annual average temperature, precipitation, and hours of sunshine at each time point were extracted from the dataset of daily climate data from Chinese surface stations for global exchange (V3.0) 79 . Grassland area proportions at each time point were provided by the Center for Resources and Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences ( http://www.resdc.cn ) 80 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil attribute information used in this study was extracted from the Harmonized World Soil Database V1.2 81 , while average distances between small watersheds and their nearest adjacent highway, water source, and provincial capital were used as location characteristic indices. Categorical variables included grassland types and the presence of NNRs within small watersheds; these data were obtained from the Remote Sensing Monitoring Atlas for the Qinghai River Headwaters Ecosystem 34 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings presented here are promising and suggest avenues for future research. In particular, hierarchical SDMs could be further evaluated and tested for their use in a variety of local conservation efforts (see Guisan et al., ), such as reintroduction programs (Araújo & Peterson, ), management of endangered plant species (Wang et al., ), species selection in vegetation restoration programs (Gastón et al., ), comparing various scale preferences in partnership with stakeholders (Hughes et al., ), forest management (Mateo et al., ), and, especially, in the development of local restoration programs in the context of climate change (Eitzel et al., ; Jiang & Zhang, ). The consequences of climate change for the application of vegetation restoration, in particular, need further investigation (Harris, Hobbs, Higgs, & Aronson, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%