2012
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.35.7996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Early Palliative Care on Chemotherapy Use and End-of-Life Care in Patients With Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract: Although patients with metastatic NSCLC received similar numbers of chemotherapy regimens in the sample, early palliative care optimized the timing of final chemotherapy administration and transition to hospice services, key measures of quality end-of-life care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

19
339
2
15

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 493 publications
(375 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
19
339
2
15
Order By: Relevance
“…A review conducted by the American Society of Clinical Oncology found that, although many studies of palliative care interventions were not comparable because of variation in the services provided, all such interventions provided patients with some improvement in quality of life, symptoms, or satisfaction with care, in the absence of evidence of harm or increased cost 33 . A randomized controlled trial of early palliative care in metastatic lung cancer patients found not only a reduction in chemotherapy use in the last 2 months of life, earlier admission to hospice, and improved quality of life, but also improved survival 34,35 . Furthermore, no difference was observed in the number of lines of chemotherapy provided in the early-palliative-care and standard-care arms, nor any difference in time to progression between the lines of chemotherapy, suggesting that anticancer care and palliative care can be effectively delivered simultaneously 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A review conducted by the American Society of Clinical Oncology found that, although many studies of palliative care interventions were not comparable because of variation in the services provided, all such interventions provided patients with some improvement in quality of life, symptoms, or satisfaction with care, in the absence of evidence of harm or increased cost 33 . A randomized controlled trial of early palliative care in metastatic lung cancer patients found not only a reduction in chemotherapy use in the last 2 months of life, earlier admission to hospice, and improved quality of life, but also improved survival 34,35 . Furthermore, no difference was observed in the number of lines of chemotherapy provided in the early-palliative-care and standard-care arms, nor any difference in time to progression between the lines of chemotherapy, suggesting that anticancer care and palliative care can be effectively delivered simultaneously 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A randomized controlled trial of early palliative care in metastatic lung cancer patients found not only a reduction in chemotherapy use in the last 2 months of life, earlier admission to hospice, and improved quality of life, but also improved survival 34,35 . Furthermore, no difference was observed in the number of lines of chemotherapy provided in the early-palliative-care and standard-care arms, nor any difference in time to progression between the lines of chemotherapy, suggesting that anticancer care and palliative care can be effectively delivered simultaneously 35 . Providing standard cancer care, including systemic therapy, together with early palliative care appears to provide both quantity and quality of life to patients with advanced disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discontinuing EOL chemotherapy is one of the "top five" practices that could reduce medical costs and improve patients' care [11]. Greer et al [12] reported that patients with concurrent palliative and oncologic care ceased intravenous chemotherapy 2 months earlier than did those without palliative care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In contrast, good patientclinician communication can result in patients experiencing better emotional health, improvement in symptoms, increased quality of life, and reduced intensity of treatment at the end of life. [2][3][4][5] Despite the importance of communication, physician and nurse practitioner communication skills training is often conducted using methods, such as lectures, that have not been shown to result in behavior change. In addition, role modeling is infrequent and trainees report that they frequently communicate bad news to patients with little training, supervision, or feedback.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%