Effect of E-waste rubber on mechanical behavior of glass a fiber reinforced with epoxy composites

Sriramamurthy, Lokesh K.; Hunasikatti, Subhas; R, Naveen Kumar J; Kannantha, Vinayaka; Pai, Raghavendra

doi:10.1063/1.5092886

Cited by 14 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The four ways used to recycle e-waste, along with continuous recycling processes, decreased the salient properties of the material. Lokesh et al 2 experimented with the effects of e-waste rubber on the mechanical behavior of glass fiber composite. The specimen was prepared with woven fiber and epoxy material.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental analysis of mechanical properties of e-waste composite materials with dual glass fibers

Raja,

Ayyakkannu,

Rathinasamy

2024

Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical characteristics and application of e-waste as a filler for glass fiber composites made of S and E (e-waste + S E). Metal, printed circuit boards, integrated circuits, diodes, and transistors were separated from the e-waste filler during milling. S and E glass fiber, epoxy, and filler were utilized in proportions of 10%, 10%, and 70%, respectively, on a volume basis. The hand lay-up technique was used to construct composite specimens. Scanning electron microscope analysis was used to gauge how filler loading affected the morphology of composite materials. The composite has a compressive strength of 23.760 MPa, which is 69.71% higher than the Geo poly composite. The tensile strength of this composite is withstood up to 16.078 MPa. It has 53% better tensile properties than Sunflower Husk composites with the same operating conditions. It gives a resistance up to 42 D during hardness test to withstand. It was 15.6% better than the NF30% epoxy composite specimen. The e-waste + S E composite gives a great opposite force of up to 2 kJ on the impact load test.; it was 86.9% higher than fly ash epoxy composites.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%