2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of drying temperature and beeswax content on physical properties of whey protein emulsion films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
32
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, beeswax is absolutely water resistant compared to GG matrix which could have resulted in lower WVTR. Similar results indicating reduced WVTR on addition of beeswax was also obtained in earlier studies on whey protein (Soazo et al, 2011) and pea starch (Han et al, 2006) films. Surprisingly, further increase in beeswax concentration resulted in increase in WVTR.…”
Section: Wvtr Of Films Having Control Beeswax and Other Additivessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, beeswax is absolutely water resistant compared to GG matrix which could have resulted in lower WVTR. Similar results indicating reduced WVTR on addition of beeswax was also obtained in earlier studies on whey protein (Soazo et al, 2011) and pea starch (Han et al, 2006) films. Surprisingly, further increase in beeswax concentration resulted in increase in WVTR.…”
Section: Wvtr Of Films Having Control Beeswax and Other Additivessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Tensile strength decreased from 86 MPa at a beeswax concentration of 0.63% to 35 MPa when beeswax was increased to 1.88%, while concentrations of others additives were at their respective center point as previously described. Soazo et al (2011) also reported that addition of beeswax significantly reduces tensile strength of whey protein emulsion films. Navarro-Tarazaga et al (2008) had earlier explained that the negative effect of beeswax addition in hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) films was caused by the disruption of the HPMC continuous matrix, thus, resulting in the development of a heterogeneous film structure and a consequent decrease in tensile strength.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Films Having Control Beeswax and Otmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the final stage of the process, the film-forming suspension of the polymer is dried on an appropriate support. In the literature, several researchers reported on the influence of drying conditions on the mechanical and barrier properties of alginate, gelatin, whey protein, chitosan, soy protein, amylose, and amylopectin films (Alcantara, Rumsey, & Krochta, 1998;Da Silva, Bierhalz, & Kieckbush, 2012;Denavi et al, 2009;Fernández-Pan, Ziani, Pedroza-Islas, & Maté, 2010;Jangchud & Chinnan, 1999;Mayachiew & Devahastin, 2008;Menegalli, Sobral, Roques, & Laurent, 1999;Rindlav-Wetsling, Standing, Hermansson, & Gatenholm, 1998;Soazo, Rubiolo, & Verdini, 2011;Stading, Rindlav-Westling, & Gatenholm, 2001;Thakhiew, Devahastin, & Soponronnarit, 2010). In the case of starch films, the drying conditions bring about changes in crystallinity and mechanical properties as a function of the amylose and amylopectin contents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in puncture resistance are due to the disruption of the biopolymer continuous matrix provoking a heterogeneous structure (Soazo et al, 2011). Nonetheless, in edible films containing blends of various biopolymers, as polysaccharides, proteins and/or lipids, there is a developed cooperative functionality taking advantage of each constitutive biopolymer, where a gum which may impart structural cohesion and serve as a structural matrix; a protein which may give rise to a very tight structure by inter-or intra-molecular folding; or a lipid that adds a hydro-repulsive character (Wu et al, 2002).…”
Section: Puncture Force and Puncture Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%