2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-017-1181-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of drying and extraction conditions on the recovery of bioactive compounds from Chlorella vulgaris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, there was no significant reduction in carotenoid content after applying tested drying methods, for both homogenized and non-homogenized samples. Since chlorophylls are not heat-sensitive as carotenoids, oxidation seems to be the reason of low chlorophyll recovery after drying, which is in agreement with Stramarkou et al (2017) study.…”
Section: Effect Of Drying and High-pressure Homogenizationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Also, there was no significant reduction in carotenoid content after applying tested drying methods, for both homogenized and non-homogenized samples. Since chlorophylls are not heat-sensitive as carotenoids, oxidation seems to be the reason of low chlorophyll recovery after drying, which is in agreement with Stramarkou et al (2017) study.…”
Section: Effect Of Drying and High-pressure Homogenizationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One of the conditions that affect the choice of method and the drying performance is the initial moisture that the microalgal biomass presents. The algal biomass starts the drying process with initial moisture values between 55 and 88% (wet basis) in different dehydration processes [25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Drying and Microalgal Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the color change, the compound degradation, and the drying kinetics, the final moisture content can be one parameter to compare different drying methods and demonstrates how these methods can affect the sample. Based on the initial moisture and the chosen method, the drying can show high or low drying rates, can influence the velocity heat and water mass transfer through the samples, and in some conditions not allow the diffusion between the interior and the surface [26,28]. In short, apart from the initial moisture that can influence the chosen method, some physical parameters can influence in velocity and water outlet, impacting in final moisture and in quality of the product.…”
Section: Drying and Microalgal Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As compared with high speed homogenization, the ultrasonication method was less effective on cell walls disruption, but more effective on disintegrating the microalgal colonies into single individual cells [20], [37], [38], when an acoustic power level of 65 W and 130 W, was used for 25 min. Microalgae cell disruption by ultrasonic treatment was evaluated also on Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [39] and it was shown that 800 J/10 mL were needed to maximize the cell disruption, but is a risky procedure since free radicals can be released, affecting the quality of the sample.Bead milling is a mechanical blending unsing a physical grinding of the cell suspension with solid glass beads, the effeciency of disintegration increasing with bead loading [20]. A comparative study of different cell wall disrupting methods on Chlorella sp.…”
Section: Extraction Of Bioactive Ingredients: Challenges and New Techmentioning
confidence: 99%