2013
DOI: 10.1021/jp403177e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Doping Density on the Charge Rearrangement and Interface Dipole at the Molecule–Silicon Interface

Abstract: The interface level alignment of alkyl and alkenyl monolayers, covalently bound to oxide-free Si substrates of various doping levels, is studied using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Using shifts in the C 1s and Si 2p photoelectron peaks as a sensitive probe, we find that charge distribution around the covalent Si–C bond dipole changes according to the initial position of the Fermi level within the Si substrate. This shows that the interface dipole is not fixed but rather changes with the doping level. These… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(77 reference statements)
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They open up the door to the examination of the influence of doping in several such systems, e.g., well-ordered SAMs of organic molecules on Si, which have been reported to be well passivated, but may possess significant doping-related surface polarization effects. [19][20][21]23 When dealing with nonpassivated semiconductor surfaces, additional considerations must be taken into account. In this case, one expects charge transfer between the semiconductor bulk and surface states, resulting in a surface SCR that further modifies the work function, 12,13 and affects surface properties, in general.…”
Section: Slab Calculations: Fermi Level and Work-function Dependenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They open up the door to the examination of the influence of doping in several such systems, e.g., well-ordered SAMs of organic molecules on Si, which have been reported to be well passivated, but may possess significant doping-related surface polarization effects. [19][20][21]23 When dealing with nonpassivated semiconductor surfaces, additional considerations must be taken into account. In this case, one expects charge transfer between the semiconductor bulk and surface states, resulting in a surface SCR that further modifies the work function, 12,13 and affects surface properties, in general.…”
Section: Slab Calculations: Fermi Level and Work-function Dependenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, doping has been suggested to play a more active, explicit role in several important phenomena, e.g., thermoelectric power, [14][15][16] surface reconstruction and passivation, 17,18 and interface dipole and level alignment at organic-inorganic interfaces. [19][20][21][22][23] Furthermore, the above-mentioned separation of length scales becomes increasingly blurred for high doping levels where the SCR is much narrower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) The distinction between ϕ surf and ϕ slab is no longer clear; this is in keeping with the blurring of the distinction between band bending and surface dipole at microscopic distances from the surface [12]. We denote their sum by ϕ tot S .…”
Section: B Finding the Common Energy U Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many cases global doping effects may play a crucial part in determining the microscopic properties of the surface or interface. These include, to name a few experimental examples reported in recent literature, the observation of a doping-dependent surface dipole [11,12], control of the work function of ZnO surfaces via doping-dependent charge transfer to an adsorbed The semi-infinite part of the system is "moved left," creating a parallel capacitor with an intermediate vacuum "layer." (d) Description of a typical slab system after contraction of the SCR to a charged sheet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9−12 The most widely used approaches for derivatizing the surface of silicon involve the formation of Si−H bonds (hydride termination), 13−17 Si−O bonds (oxidation and silyl ether linkages), 18−21 Si−Cl bonds, 22,23 and Si−C bonds (via reactions such as hydrosilylation). 24−32 The nature of the linkage to the surface, including bond length and dipole, can have profound effects on electronic properties of the underlying silicon, 33−37 including modulation of work function, 38−40 introduction of surface states of varying energies, 41 as well as affecting the packing of an overlying organic monolayer in the case of molecular adsorbates. 37,42 The band edges of a semiconductor are highly sensitive to the nature of the bound surface molecules, 37 and thus choice of surface termination is important.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%