1987
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(87)90358-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of dopamine-receptor blockade on stimulation-induced feeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The boundaries of LH tissue (35) and the refractory periods (36) of corresponding fibers supporting the two behaviors are the same. Because LH stimulation increases dopamine release (10,30), and each behavior is attenuated by dopamine antagonists (20,21,37), it seemed reasonable that this was a common mechanistic element driving both responses. Indeed, early in vivo optogenetic studies have demonstrated convincingly that stimulation of midbrain dopamine neurons is sufficient for reward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The boundaries of LH tissue (35) and the refractory periods (36) of corresponding fibers supporting the two behaviors are the same. Because LH stimulation increases dopamine release (10,30), and each behavior is attenuated by dopamine antagonists (20,21,37), it seemed reasonable that this was a common mechanistic element driving both responses. Indeed, early in vivo optogenetic studies have demonstrated convincingly that stimulation of midbrain dopamine neurons is sufficient for reward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporally precise inhibition of VTA dopamine cell firing through optogenetic stimulation of VTA GABA neurons disrupts licking for sucrose solutions in hungry mice (19). Similarly, stimulation-induced eating in sated animals is attenuated by dopamine receptor antagonists at low doses that preserve locomotor function (20,21). Although dopamine is clearly necessary for the initiation of eating, its ability to promote eating in the absence of physiological need is unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%